posted by davidt on Wednesday May 19 2004, @11:00AM
bingobars writes:

A rather uninteresting article published in Tuesdays Daily Star ‘Hot’ section titled Britney’s the Devil came to my attention. An early 90’s picture of the Moz brandished besides a rather dismal picture of Mrs Spears. The editor taps immediately into Morrissey’s slamming of Britney with keen interest and his felling of the pop idols. Just as I began to sense positive progress it reverts to the Bowie comments and describes an ageing 80’s hero even slamming an idol who continually reinvents himself. (Seriously the article had no real objective) Worse yet, the editor questions whether Mozza has got it wrong and describes Britney as a bona fide pop phenomenon. It portrays YATQ as another in a long line of Maudlin Twaddle “he’s” been peddling for 20 years. To be honest I don’t know where im going with this but what twats at the Daily Star. It’s a good thing the paper is filled with enough Tits to keeps 99% of the readers from being subjected to the Bull inside. What will they make of YATQ at No1 I wonder?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • I actually saw that "article" (God has that term ever been used so loosely??) and was going to put it up on the board but it was just too horrendously ridiculously so didnt bother. Seriously though if the Daily Star were championing Moz, Id be worried. They're complete ignoramus'

    Disturbed
    Anonymous -- Thursday May 20 2004, @05:21AM (#104162)


[ home | terms of service ]