posted by davidt on Sunday December 02 2007, @05:30PM
Merck Mercuriadis writes:
Morrissey vs NME

In Response To Tim Jonze Blog

It would be easy to feel sorry for Tim Jonze. He is clearly out of his depth and has panicked to the point of admitting in writing that he will say anything to anybody if it gets him what he wants. Clearly integrity - journalistic or otherwise - means nothing to him and he has just spelled it our for every reader, publicist, band, editor and potential employer to know.

It is arguable that he has just been a pawn in Conor McNicholas's zeal to make a name for himself at Morrissey's expense but on the other hand the level of collusion between the two of them would appear to be thicker than blood. We won't know until we get to court and start picking them apart.

What we do know as evidenced by his posts is that Tim is prepared to say and do anything. Keep that in mind when reading his work and particularly this weeks NME cover story.

Best wishes,

Merck Mercuriadis

Los Angeles

December 2nd, 2007

PS If you are interested in Morrissey's personal view on the subject note he will be issuing a statement on Tuesday morning.
posted by davidt on Sunday December 02 2007, @03:30PM
2-J writes:
Tim Jonze has responded to the latest item on Moz-solo in a comment on his previous Guardian blog entry:

timjonze
Comment No. 813920
December 2 3:39
Bangkok/tha Oh dear. Right. I was in New York writing a piece on Morrissey. Morrissey WAS charming. I WAS a big Smiths fan. I WAS nervous before the interview. All true. Of course I needed guest list for the gigs, it was essential to the story. The gigs were also very good. Great, in fact. I wrote all this in the original piece. Maybe one day I'll be able to print what I wrote and you will see that. Who knows.

Now, if I'd come screaming out of the interview shouting "HE'S USING THE LANGUAGE OF THE BNP, I'M GOING TO TELL THE WORLD" then I'd never have got to see the gigs (essential part of my brief) and I'd have had pressure from management to swing the piece in their favour which, although it wouldn't have made a difference, I'd sooner not have to put up with. There's no obligation to tell management that you don't like their artist's comments. It's his own stupid fault for spouting all that drivel. By now, Morrissey should really know how interviews work. He doesn't deserve warnings and copy approval. Christ, he wasn't even ASKED about immigration.

Journalists can't strop off in disgust during an interview, just because they don't agree with their interviewee. Their sole purpose of being there is for the readers of the magazine, to get the story as accurate as possible.

Also, I didn't write this blog for publicity as some people have suggested (come on, I'm getting a right load of abuse here, it's not much fun!). I wrote it simply because the story in the press that Moz had been stiched up by NME and I was trying to cover up his comments was NOT TRUE. Honestly, that is all. If something's not true, why not put it right?

I have no problem with Moz saying he is "nostalgic for his working class background" as some people have suggested. Sadly, he didn't say this. For someone so good with words, he certainly can't find the right ones if this was what he meant. I also have no problem with him saying the country has changed, or that he is against immigration for sensible reasons. All fine if that's what he thinks. But his language is not fine. The language he used isn't helpful to anyone in a sensible discussion about immigration. Also, I didn't say he was like a member of the BNP, either. I said he was using the LANGUAGE of the BNP. This is true. Check out their website.

Do some of you not find it just a little bit desperate that Merck is posting all these private emails as some kind of proof that his artist is in the right? He's not tackling the issue at all, just trying to muddy it by printing my emails to him. Why doesn't Moz make a comment on race instead, as Love Music Hate Racism have called for in a very well worded press release? Presumably this is up online somewhere?

Tim

Ps Thanks to those of you who have posted reasonable comments on this, either for or against my blog. The discussion on this is very important and interesting. It's a shame there's so much nonsense drowning it out
posted by davidt on Sunday December 02 2007, @03:30PM
An anonymous person writes:
This was posted on the forum:

Fans back Morrissey in 'NME' racism row - The Independent
By Jerome Taylor
Published: 01 December 2007

After the week he's just had, Morrissey can at least sing with some authority that famous line: "Now I know how Joan of Arc felt." Ever since NME published its now notorious interview with the outspoken singer, in which he said Britain had lost its identity and has been "flooded" with immigrants, the former Smiths frontman has risked the bonfire of his own reputation as an idol for successive indie generations.

But the average Morrissey fan, it seems, is determined to defend the reputation of a singer they say remains one of the country's best songwriters, not withstanding the occasional unfortunate soundbite.
posted by davidt on Sunday December 02 2007, @03:30PM
An anonymous person sends the link:

Classic albums - The Smiths: The Queen Is Dead - Virgin Media

Top facts:

  • There Is A Light That Never Goes Out wasn't ever released as a single until 1992, five years after the band split up.

  • The album's cover image was designed by Morrissey himself and features French actor Alain Delon from the 1964 film L'Insoumis.

  • The Boy With The Thorn In His Side was the very first Smiths single for which the band shot a video. Morrissey later revealed: "The thorn is the music industry and all those people who never believed anything I said".
posted by davidt on Sunday December 02 2007, @03:30PM
vivamoz writes:
www.viva-moz.com

Hello and welcome to Viva-Moz.com! The internet's first ever Morrissey dedicated shop. Bringing you the coolest and most unique Moz Memorabilia. (And some Smiths stuff too)
Today's News | December 3 | December 1  >


[ home | terms of service ]