Main
Morrissey "interview" in Q (Jan.)
Posted on Mon, Dec 6 1999 at 9:47 a.m. PST
by David T. <[email protected]>
This can't be a real interview with Q as implied by the magazine, can it? Thanks to Smilingontim for the transcript and scan:

The following feature appears in this months issue of Q. A picture from Nottingham's Rock City accompanies it;

"I AM A VICTIM!"

In a rare interview, Morrissey lashes out at a High Court judge, his biographer and Britain itself.

Morrissey appears to be suffering from a full-blown persecution complex. The 40- year-old singer is still smarting from the decision of High Court Judge Mr Justice Weeks, who on December 1, 1996 ruled that Morrissey and The Smiths guitarist Johnny Marr owed the band's ex-drummer, Mike Joyce, back-dated royalties.

Two years later, on November 6, 1998, Morrissey lost a high-profile appeal against the verdict, leaving him and Marr (who'd quietly accepted the initial court ruling) with a £1 million payout to Joyce, plus legal costs which ran into hundreds of thousands of pounds.

Morrissey claims, " I was a victim of the judicial system in England," and outlines a personal opinion that the highly respected judge is "completely unintelligent" and "an appalling, public menace of a justice, ...He can destroy your life."

Without producing a shred of evidence, Morrissey also argues that he was the victim of a right-wing, class-conscious plot. "You are working class and you are made to feel like a peasant. We have to realise that this judge is a Lord of the Hunt and I have in the past said things about that. I have also said things about Thatcher who more than likely appointed him. I have also said things about the royal family. This judge wanted to grind me down."

Referring to Mr Weeks' description of Morrissey as "devious, truculent and unreliable" witness, the ex-Smiths frontman makes the allegation that, "His (Weeks') final judgement went to every length to strip me down and destroy me as a human being. If I can get somebody to examine his words and the case, I believe he'd have to step down." On November 6, 1998 the appeal court dismissed Morrissey's claim that Weeks' comments were an "unjust and gratuitous attack" on his character.

Morrissey's grudge against Smiths biographer Johnny Rogan (in 1990 the Smiths frontman said he hoped the author would "end his days very soon in an M3 pile-up") is still festering a decade later. The singer discusses Rogan's research for a follow-up book in terms of an intrusion. "People say, well, he's obviously gay and loves you," he says mirthlessly.

Now living in Los Angeles, the '80's bedsit icon has withdrawn into a claustrophobic world where everyone in Britain is out to get him.

"There is an extreme disregard for anything I do in Britain. People tell me about what I've done and the legacy but I don't feel it. I'm sitting here without a record company.

I'm not desperate," he adds.

* item archived - comments / notes can no longer be added.

Comments / Notes



Ahhhhh, yes. Those clever people at Q have finally jumped on the old degrading Morrissey bandwagon. It was only a matter of time that before they started quoting Morrissey only on the things that made him really upset. Of course anybody's going to look like a bitch when you do that.

James <[email protected]>
Ann Arbor,MI - Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 10:27:06 (PST) | #1




The wonderful media, I love how they take things out of context, put a bunch of negative things together, then produce another Morrissey bashing article. If someone asked me my thoughts in an interview, then left all out but the negative, I'd look like a complete ass. Q of all mags...oh well.(they picked a great picture by the way)

Mute001 <[email protected] >
Sunnyvale, CA USA - Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 10:38:05 (PST) | #2




Actually i think it is good to see Moz recalling his working-class Thatcher-hating Royal Family-bashing past. I'd begun to think he'd forgotten all about that stuff!!

But i do not think much of the photo. And WHY the West Ham top??

Mike Rice <[email protected]>
UK - Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 11:47:26 (PST) | #3




ughh...

VAUXHALL
CA - Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 12:11:47 (PST) | #4




i'm a victim as well.

texaho
fort worth, tx - Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 12:56:23 (PST) | #5




(to texaho) no, you're an insecure bully (although you must've been a victim at one point to get to this ugly stage. now all you can do is die.)

:|
- Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 13:39:03 (PST) | #6




Morrissey os still a god in our eyes!!!

viva mozzfan <[email protected]>
Santa Barbara - Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 13:47:24 (PST) | #7




Morrissey is still a god in our eyes!!!

viva mozzfan <[email protected]>
Santa Barbara - Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 13:47:54 (PST) | #8




Ein klein bißchen sehr nachtragend und wie immer zornig, man vergißt irgendwann, es als Qualität anzusehen.

Churchillian Legs <[email protected]>
- Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 14:28:14 (PST) | #9




this sort of thing is just so distressing..who is this this so called journalism trying to reach? what are they trying to prove?
didnt i read he's wearing that shirt at every gig??

jewels <[email protected]>
- Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 15:25:40 (PST) | #10




Ha ha HA! That article is hilarious! So totally ridiculous it's amusing.

Vaguely Interested
- Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 16:02:33 (PST) | #11




This isn't a very flattering photograph.

kissNtell
- Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 19:01:12 (PST) | #12




shame on Q! in the tasteful tradition of tabloids they have chosen to publish possibly the most unflattering photo of morrissey i've ever seen... just to spite him.

moz, "this photographer must have really had it in for you..." i'll see you at the hollywood palladium!

Carlos <[email protected]>
Houston, Texas USA - Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 19:54:21 (PST) | #13




STOP STOP STOP
To those people who posted comments stating how rude Q magazine has acted: Where did you get your info. Please...read the magazine and past magazines of Q before you decide to post your comments and Q (In the same issue,december)even put Vauxhall and I as in the top ten in the year it came out. I just feel people tend to post comments on face value and that's not fair to the magazine...if it was NME i would have a different opinion.

they even have a quite refreshing trivia question regarding moz on one particular page. Which happens to mention David Bowie.

Moz cowboy <[email protected]>
Long Beach - Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 19:56:53 (PST) | #14




......now the photo, now that's another issue and bad taste.

Moz cowboy <[email protected]>
Long Beach - Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 19:58:18 (PST) | #15




ya know, this is one of the strangest things I have ever read.

suzanne
the white patriarchal bourgeiosie is bringing us down! - Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 21:06:09 (PST) | #16




indeed, looks like someone didn't have their oatbran this morning

so sorry
I could smell you, but i would have to kill you - Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 21:59:21 (PST) | #17




I happen to think it is a very nice picture. L.A. has obviously been very good to him. He looks wonderfully tanned.

Dolly
- Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 23:48:03 (PST) | #18




Erm, doesn't the very fact that a respected music magazine went to the trouble of composing such a misleading, scurrilous, poisonous piece of journalism out of yellowing news clippings and try to pass it off as an interview tends to prove that Morrissey is right to think that they're 'out to get him?'

By the way, did the journalist just make up the quote about Johnny Rogan being gay? In the original, if memory serves me right, Morrissey just said that when he asked people about Rogan when he was researching his first book they told him 'well, he loves you'. Which is not the same thing at all. Obviously 'Q' magazine just wanted to throw in the the 'gay' thing in a malicious way and so put the 'accusation' into Morrissey's mouth. I think that Morrissey and/or Rogan and/or GLAAD should sue Q magazine.

GlamSkin <[email protected]>
London - Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 03:42:16 (PST) | #19




I'm not surprised by Morrissey whining about the court case. On the GLR interview Morrissey went on and on for quite some time about the case and how the whole judicial system in Britian was bad. He's obviously fixated by the loss. It's sort of sad. He just needs to get over it.

Beret Bitch
- Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 08:31:51 (PST) | #20




boy, this is getting so old, blame everything on the media. To get the record straight: morrissey said those things, they are not made up. It is also relevant to put all his "I am such a victim" complaints next to each other. Shows the readers there is a pattern there, and that good old moz likes to deal blows but is upset when being struck back.
I think his court case whining is rediculous and embarassing, I mean, read the comments about people who have worked with morrissey, they all say pretty much the same thing as that judge. But their quotes are pulled out of context, right?
Wake up, listen to morrissey's records, cos they are great (well not his last two, the noise my bird makes is better than those records), enjoy his wit in interviews, and long for his beautiful body, but face the facts: the man is a hypocrit and a major jerk with an overblown ego.

chickenkiller
- Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 10:12:14 (PST) | #21




Paulo Di Canio plays for the senior team. Perhaps Morrissey likes the mad Italian. He was great for Celtic.

Spiral Stairs
- Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 10:19:58 (PST) | #22




Did someone hit Morrissey in the groin before this picture was taken? What a hideous picture. He looks pretty tan though. Does he bring a tanning bed on the tour so that he feels like he's still in L.A? Who cares about the press and the past.

Buck toothed girl from Luxembourg
- Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 10:57:14 (PST) | #23




Moz looks like he is trying to squeeze a giant log out of his ass! Now all you morrissey addicts know what he looks like when he takes a @#!!!! I'm sure you're beside yourself BUCKTOOTHED GIRL!

Jake
TD SALES - Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 12:24:55 (PST) | #24





for chickenkiller:
are you a fan of The Triffids?

beautiful waste
Chicago,IL - Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 13:00:10 (PST) | #25




I sympathise w/ Morrissey - his business is his own; but unfortunately, celebrities have no right to privacy, if the media are to have their way. Should I ever attempt to shift my lazy bum and become mildly famous, I shudder at the thought of someone else deciding what everyone should or should not know about my life. As it stands now, anyone who thinks they know me only finds out a "cover" is, indeed, misleading! Regarding the photo: I happen to like the way he looks when he growls! Wahey!!

J. Razor
- Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 13:31:50 (PST) | #26




All of you who are defending Morrissey's character, saying the press are out to get him because all they print are his negative comments, are quite foolish. You don't know Morrissey. How do you know that the whole interview wasn't just him complaining. Besides, his musical reputation is built on complaining and pointing out the negative. He'd be nothing without that melancholy wit. So wake up, and be glad that Q printed the things they did. Morrissey is glad, I assure you. His reputation depends on comments like those.

bdb
- Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 19:06:17 (PST) | #27




i'm still pissed at Q magazine for ranking the gallaghers at the 3 and 4 spot on their 100 greatest musicians of all time list...3 and 4...way up compared to the quite meager spots given to morrissey and johnny marr..and the current issue in the states features liam gallagher as the voice of the nineties...bollocks!

so dumb things like this no longer bother me, nor do they surprise me...music mags in the states and music mags in the uk - it's all the same now: garbage.

state of emergency
- Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 01:32:21 (PST) | #28




Nice photo. It looks like Moz spunked on his trousers... The facial expression and mic placement do little to make me think otherwise.

Logic Johnson
- Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 02:07:30 (PST) | #29




to beautifil waste:

Yep, I am a Triffids fan. Still the best band ever to be around if you ask me, but nobody ever does.
And while I am at it: Life of Crime the best lyrics to a song ever.

chickenkiller
- Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 14:56:48 (PST) | #30




That's Morrissey at his best!! I am a fan(atic) of him eversince I heard the album Viva Hate, and up to now, my devotion is unchanged.
I think people just can't accept the fact that he is a legend, an icon.
Anyway, belated happy birthday to Thea Torres of UST. I missed you, really.

Christian Cruz <[email protected]>
University of the Philippines, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines - Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 20:25:09 (PST) | #31




to chickenkiller

I can't believe I've found a Triffids fan on a Morrissey website. I thought I was the only one who liked both The Smiths and The Triffids.
Could you please email me?

beautiful waste <[email protected]>
Chicago,IL - Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 03:02:04 (PST) | #32




forget about it.
get on with it

stay morbid
get a tan
i need 6 seconds to spare


funky town - Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 11:05:51 (PST) | #33




The Media, takes alot out of order, and puts it
all in disray.
After many years of dumb ass @#!!!, some drummer
who still would be a nobody, if it wasn't for
The Smiths, goes and sues Morrissey, and Marr!!
Where is that drummer now??? I don't see, anybody
giving him any respect and loyalty, like they do
Morrissey still! I mean come on now, they didn't owe him a dam red cent, but because he is a cry baby, and in the stupid eyes of the high court dumbass- yes dumb ass, Morrissey is always the bad guy!! Why???
When he makes his fans feel so wonderful, and is a
good person, he shows it, in all the things he does. That's why people love him so much!!
That's okay Morrissey, Whatever goes around comes
around, and all the people who put a knife in your
back will soon get the same knife back, but deeper
and more painful.

Anna <[email protected]>
Not close enough to Morrissey - Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 22:11:54 (PST) | #34




just like dylan in the bathroom

lil'boo
- Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 23:16:28 (PST) | #35




Can I say something very generally?

The music industry just brings out the worst in people.

It may be tiresome to hear how Morrissey is a victim, but you have to imagine after being in the business as long as he has, it gets pretty tiresome looking over your shoulder. The thing is, nobody cares about you or your well being in this game. They look at you much differently in how you can help them.

I'm a musician, and I'm already getting crap even though I'm a minor player on the stage of the world. I came into a bit of luck recently as far as advancing my career. One friend of mine has now given me the cold shoulder because he is a musician and pining for his old band to get back together. I told him about what had happened. He grumbled, made a few underhanded comments and he disappeared.

Another has now taken my new contact and is trying to steal my thunder even though he had nothing to do with my music and all he did was help me record something that was vaguely related to what I do. This guy is a delusional freak who thinks that because of his bit of technical work on a related project that I happened to mail along with my usual package, my new contact is blown away by him, although the other guy has never made any mention of wanting to get in contact with the leach for any project. He snuck around my back anyway and presented himself as the big cheese of the project the other guy liked (but didn't like for anything beyond strictly what I did in it) and is now huffing himself up about how he now has his foot in the door to me despite the fact that the other guy does not deal in that area. When I told the loser to leave him alone and possibly not spoil the working relationship I had, he told me to go away and that he has to keep up with his stake in the whole matter.

I don't remember the last time I've been so angry.

I didn't realize it at the time when I shared with him the good news that he would turn on me. I was hoping to do something a bit communal and let people around me share in my bit of happiness. In the music industry, it's just not possible to do that with people who are hungry.

sad and wise
keeping everyone's paws out of the cookie jar - Sun, Dec 12, 1999 at 12:52:38 (PST) | #36




He can't exactly 'Throw his white body down' now, can he?

Where the bloody hell did he get that tan? When I went to see him in Leeds he didn't look that tanned. He probably took one look at the pasty-bodied town of Leeds in the North, and all the colour drained from his face.

Don't worry about the comments, I expect he likes them, the only reason they are typing cutting articles about him is because he won't give any British music mags an interview. So all they have is a collection of the worst news so they stick them all together with Prick Stick and there you have your 'Morrissey' interview.

Morrissey could stop all that tomorrow by picking up the phone and talking to them, so I doubt he's having nightmares......

Kate <[email protected]>
Halifax, England - Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 05:57:01 (PST) | #37






* return to Morrissey-solo