Billy Bragg: long statement re: Morrissey on Facebook (7 July, 2019)




"Last Sunday, while much of the British media were lauding Stormzy’s Glastonbury headline show as epoch defining, Morrissey posted a white supremacist video on his website, accompanied by the comment ‘Nothing But Blue Skies for Stormzy...The Gallows for Morrissey’. The nine minute clip lifted footage from the grime star’s Pyramid Stage performance while arguing that the British establishment are using him to promote multiculturalism at the expense of white culture.

The YouTube channel of the video’s author contains other clips expressing , among other things, homophobia, racism and misogyny - left wing women of colour are a favourite target for his ire. There are also clips expounding the Great Replacement Theory, a far right conspiracy trope which holds that there is a plot of obliterate the white populations of Europe and North America through mass immigration and cultural warfare.

My first thought was to wonder what kind of websites Morrissey must be trawling in order to be able to find and repost this clip on the same day that it appeared online? I came home from Glastonbury expecting to see some angry responses to his endorsement of white supremacism. Instead, the NME published an interview with Brandon Flowers in which the Killers lead singer proclaimed that Morrissey was still “a king”, despite being in what Flowers recognised was “hot water” over his bigoted comments.

As the week progressed, I kept waiting for some reaction to the white supremacist video, yet none was forthcoming. Every time I googled Morrissey, up would pop another article from a music website echoing the NME’s original headline: ‘The Killers Brandon Flowers on Morrissey: ‘He’s Still A King’. I’m well aware from personal experience how easy it is for an artist to find something you’ve said in the context of a longer discourse turned into an inflammatory headline that doesn’t reflect your genuine views on the subject at hand, but I have to wonder if Flowers really understands the ramifications of Morrissey’s expressions of support for the far right For Britain Party?

As the writer of the powerful Killers song ‘Land of the Free’, does he know that For Britain wants to build the kind of barriers to immigration that Flowers condemns in that lyric?
Party leader Anne Marie Walters maintains ties with Generation Identity, the group who both inspired and received funds from the gunman who murdered 50 worshippers at a Christchurch mosque. How does that sit with the condemnation of mass murder by lone gunman in ‘Land of the Free’?

As an explicitly anti-Muslim party, For Britain opposes the religious slaughter of animals without the use of a stun gun, a policy that has given Morrissey a fig leaf of respectability, allowing him to claim he supports them on animal welfare grounds. Yet if that is his primary concern, why does he not support the UK’s Animal Welfare Party, which stood candidates in the recent European elections?

Among their policies, the AWF also aim to prohibit non-stun slaughter. If his only interest was to end this practice, he could have achieved this without the taint of Islamophobia by endorsing them. They are a tiny party, but Morrissey’s vocal support would have given the animal rights movement a huge boost of publicity ahead of the polls.

Instead, he expresses support for anti-Muslim provocateurs, posts white supremacist videos and, when challenged, clutches his pearls and cries “Infamy, infamy, they’ve all got it in for me”. His recent claim that “as a so-called entertainer, I have no rights” is a ridiculous position made all the more troubling by the fact that it is a common trope among right-wing reactionaries.

The notion that certain individuals are not allowed to say certain things is spurious, not least because it is most often invoked after they’ve made their offensive comments. Look closely at their claims and you’ll find that what they are actually complaining about is the fact that they have been challenged.

The concept of freedom pushed by the new generation of free speech warriors maintains that the individual has the right to say whatever they want, whenever they want, to whoever they want, with no comeback. If that is the definition of freedom, then one need look no further than Donald Trump’s Twitter feed as our generation’s beacon of liberty. Perhaps Lady Liberty should be replaced in New York Harbour with a colossal sculpture of the Donald, wearing a toga, holding a gaslight.

Worryingly, Morrissey’s reaction to being challenged over his support of For Britain, his willingness to double down rather than apologise for any offence caused, suggests a commitment to a bigotry that tarnishes his persona as the champion of the outsider. Where once he offered solace to the victims of a cruel and unjust world, he now seems to have joined the bullies waiting outside the school gates.

As an activist, I’m appalled by this transformation, but as a Smiths fan, I’m heartbroken.

It was Johnny Marr’s amazing guitar that drew me to the band, but I grasped that Morrissey was an exceptional lyricist when I heard ‘Reel Around the Fountain’. Ironically, it was a line that he had stolen that won my affections. “I dreamt about you last night and I fell out of bed twice” is spoken by Jimmy, the black sailor, to his white teenage lover, Jo, in Sheila Delaney’s play ‘A Taste of Honey’.

The 1961 movie, starring Rita Tushingham was an early example of a post-war British society that would embrace multi-racial relationships (and homosexuality too). By pilfering that particular line for the song, Morrissey was placing the Smiths in the great tradition of northern working class culture that may have been in the gutter, but was looking at the stars. Yet, by posting a white supremacist video in which he is quoted as saying “Everyone prefers their own race”, Morrissey undermines that line, erasing Jo and Jimmy and all those misfit lovers to whom the Smiths once gave so much encouragement.

A week has passed since the video appeared on Morrissey’s website and nothing has been written in the media to challenge his position. Today it was reported that research by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a UK based anti-extremist organisation, reveals that the Great Replacement Theory is being promoted so effectively by the far right that it is entering mainstream political discourse.

That Morrissey is helping to spread this idea - which inspired the Christchurch mosque murderer - is beyond doubt. Those who claim that this has no relevance to his stature as an artist should ask themselves if, by demanding that we separate the singer from the song, they too are helping to propagate this racist creed."


Regards,
FWD.

172730_10150091526872471_8291732_o.jpg



Media coverage:
Related items:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Democracy is falling.

I think democracy has been an illusion for a while now. The people vote for one thing and get something completely different.
No one voted for multiculturalism but we got it. No one voted to become a minority in their homelands but it's happening. But then when the people vote for something they want but the establishment doesn't (Brexit, decreased immigration, mass deportations), it doesn't happen.

Democracy has been smoke a mirrors for decades.
 
Screw literary people. Just send it to some conservative websites to review. National Review, Human Events, etc.
Thanks for the suggestions! I'm not politically active, so I'm not aware of what sites are out there, but I just feel it's glaringly obvious that the Left is intolerant in the extreme and that it needs to be challenged for the sake of democracy and free speech, both of which are increasingly under threat. It really does seem to me to be a religion without a god, where its ideoology stands above everything; there does not seem to be the realisation that its beliefs are just opinions like everybody else's - every society that's ever existed has had different belief systems and different ideas of right and wrong yet its adherents seem to think that their narrow views are so obvious every one else must be wrong and silenced. It's really Orwellian.
 
I think democracy has been an illusion for a while now. The people vote for one thing and get something completely different.
No one voted for multiculturalism but we got it. No one voted to become a minority in their homelands but it's happening. But then when the people vote for something they want but the establishment doesn't (Brexit, decreased immigration, mass deportations), it doesn't happen.

Democracy has been smoke a mirrors for decades.

Democracy has ALWAYS been an illusion. It's a way for powerful people to keep the masses happy, serve them up what they think is some sort of choice. Occasionally situations like Trump and Brexit occur which sends things out of whack for a awhile.
 
Come back to this forum for first time in years and finding all this weird racism, not surprising I guess. Oh Morrissey, so much to answer for.

On black knife crime pretty east to disprove the racial argument here. If the problem is supposedly about Black why was there a knife crime epidemic in Glasgow ten years ago with murder rates highest in Europe, but weirdly no black people involved there. So knife crime is not about race. Maybe its to do with poorer communities (amongst other factors), would make sense as many poor white kids involved too.

Scots............William Wallace...............like a punch up.........have form for it.:rock:. White kids are involved......the ones that pretend to be black and wear hoodies and say "bro" repeatedly. Nothing to do with poverty. Everything to do with poor parenting and lack of morals.
 
Scots............William Wallace...............like a punch up.........have form for it.:rock:. White kids are involved......the ones that pretend to be black and wear hoodies and say "bro" repeatedly. Nothing to do with poverty. Everything to do with poor parenting and lack of morals.
The London knife crime problem will never be solved. Glasgow had a knife/gang culture for 200 years and it was nipped in the bud by police mercilessly kicking down doors, targeting and specifically harassing known offenders continuously. Lots of random stop and search. The courts were allowed to hand down massive sentences in prison. All these measures made it seem not worthwhile being involved in knife crime.

But in London such robust tactics would never be implemented. Why? Because they would have to specifically target one community: young black men (in London it is virtually only a young black problem). And there would be cries of RACISM! from the usual liberal troublemakers (Diane Abbott, David Lammy etc) which would grind everything to a halt.

That is the reason why the murder rate in London is going up and up (four or five street murders in the last 24 hours - which is heading towards US levels never before seen in London) and the people in power are just shrugging their shoulders and walking away.

Nobody wants to be 'the racist' who has to implement any realistic measures that might help things.
 
Last edited:
The London knife crime problem will never be solved. Glasgow had knife problems and a gang culture for 200 years and it was nipped in the bud by police kicking down doors, targeting and specifically harassing known offenders. Lots of random stop and search. The courts were allowed to hand down massive sentences in prison. They made it seem not worthwhile being involved in knife crime.

In London these radical tactics would never be implemented. Why? Because they would have to specifically target one community: young black men (as in London it is virtually only a young black problem). And there would be cries of RACISM which grinds everything to a halt.

That is the reason why the murder rate in London is going up and up (four or five street murders in the last 24 hours - which is heading towards US levels never before seen in London) and the people in power are just shrugging their shoulders and silently walking away.

I've just been banned from Twitter for a day. I had a go at some guy who was a primary school teacher and sticking up for Billy Bragg, pointed out most of the teachers I know, in their previous lifes, used to be out of their heads on coke and various other drugs or having sex with prostitutes (my best mate, don't tell him I said that:rolleyes:). Add that to FB.....I'm not having a good time on Social media:D
 
I've just been banned from Twitter for a day. I had a go at some guy who was a primary school teacher and sticking up for Billy Bragg, pointed out most of the teachers I know, in their previous lifes, used to be out of their heads on coke and various other drugs or having sex with prostitutes (my best mate, don't tell him I said that:rolleyes:). Add that to FB.....I'm not having a good time on Social media:D
Sorry to hear about this. Twitter is becoming like the Stasi. If you look at comments about half of them have already been deleted. It proves one thing though: the elite are scared. Words really are mightier than the machete!

But hey, that's some interesting 'teachers' you had there... Did you go to the school of rock 'n' roll?
 
Sorry to hear about this. Twitter is becoming like the Stasi. If you look at comments about half of them have already been deleted. It proves one thing though: the elite are scared. Words really are mightier than the machete!

But hey, that's some interesting 'teachers' you had there... Did you go to the school of rock 'n' roll?

I've always tried. I was going to Biker Hell's Angel style party's at 18. :lbf: or going to gigs like this.
 
No, 'James' I don't think all cultures or belief systems are the same. The cultures and beliefs systems I find challenging are those that use race, sexuality and religion etc. as weapons: that deftly describes all alt-right organisations no matter where they sit on the spectrum. Hate is not a place from which you step forward. I also find 'dog whistling' challenging. If a group or organisation believes in something - say it and say it clearly. Why do alt-right groups go out of their way to suggest? Do they not have enough faith in what they're selling that they have feel they must build in an escape route? It certainly seems like it. The entryists in this forum have used Morrissey as a vehicle for their hatred. Morrissey, no stranger to controversy, is currently caught in a racist shitestorm of his own making. He has been castigated and I have no problem with that at all. My problem is that enryist have used this situation to spread all manner of hatred in this forum. It never was a happy-clappy type of place but it was never like this - ever. There is hatred pouring out of every thread. There is not ist, no ism that has not been latched upon. This new level of hatred does not come from Morrissey fans or ex-fans but from a small vocal cabal of haters. It has changed a community, albeit a quarrelsome and at times unhealthy community, into a myre of hatred.

This is what "challenging multiculturism"' has brought to this forum and I want no part of it.

Oh come on, cut the holier than thou crap. There is a massive debate going on in the Western World about immigration and how much or how little people should be critical of it and the promotion of multiculturalism etc. Moz has jumped right in to this debate. Do you expect Moz-Solo to be immune from this and stay out of this debate? Of course some people may bring their own prejudices and hang-ups to the debate. That's human nature. But it doesn't make the debate not worth having. The future of Europe may be at stake - nothing trivial. Most of the hatred on this website is directed at Moz. Ironic though that might be on a Morrissey fansite...
 
Leftist to real world dictionary:

Dog whistle = saying something that is factually accurate.

Racist = anybody you disagree with.

Entryist = anybody with a strong opinion.

White supremacist = anyone who believes in the historical value of European culture.
 

Trending Threads

Back
Top Bottom