Who's Jamie Horrible meant to be? I'm probably being extremely thick, but I can't figure it out..
Jamie Oliver.
Who's Jamie Horrible meant to be? I'm probably being extremely thick, but I can't figure it out..
Exactly.It was a golden opportunity,but nothing.And no excuse for not appearing on the show apart from Cameron supporting blood sports.Maybe he just bottled it
all this because of a twitter, fascinating
I hope Moz don't start twittering now
though I did like reading what he had to say
Or maybe he didn't think he'd be able to control his temper or say anything except 'David - you are a complete and utter twat and I abhor everything you stand for'.
It was just after the non-interview in the Guardian, so maybe he'd just had enough to go through the same thing again on TV.
I'm sure no matter what he'd said, the lazy-bastard journalists in this country would have done the same reaction piece they always do. They all just seem to be 'variations on a theme':
Mention the break up of The Smiths
Mention the court case - 'devious, truculent and unreliable'
Mention that Morrissey is now mega-rich
List all his 'controversial' quotes from over the years
Project your own vision of Morrissey on to him (based on what he was like 20 years ago usually)
without bothering to analyse and report on the actual event/interview.
Plus, if it was me, I wouldn't want a politician I hated getting extra publicity off my back - even if it did give me the opportunity to vent my frustrations on the telly.
'Variations on a Theme' would make a good song title I think.
Random post over
Edit: Actually, I might as well add that I wish that S McCartney would do a range of animal friendly shoes for people who earn normal wages.
I dont think our man would use such language,Reader,certainly not on camera anyway.As for Cameron,who I have a sneaky admiration for (Ive just listened to Yes sir I can Boogie,so Im in a moment) hes upper class,thats what they do
He probably wouldn't use as foul language as me (I'm not middle-class, despite what Boris Johnson's sister may say) but that's sort of what I meant.
He wouldn't want to risk 'having a moment' on TV. Surely he'd be thinking:
'I wanna keep me reputation
I'm a sensation
You try me once, you'll beg for more
Yes Sir, I can boogie...'
Maybe. Maybe.
Your glasses are much thicker than mine, so I'll defer to your opinion
Another Edit: Come to think of it, I think that Thatcher has had a massively negative impact on the likelihood of another woman ever becoming PM. Just my opinion...
Wow. Really? Even a woman who represented a different party?
Thatcher accomplished one good thing; she made Monty Python's Parrot sketch obsolete:
I loved the opening line "I would like to, if I may, offer support to Johnny Marr" it should continue.... "when he next performs in Manchester"...
My immediate response to this is one of bemusement. Cameron's policies on hunting seem to me a highly peripheral issue, I really couldn't care less if Bryan Ferry hunts or not and Morrissey's feelings about either of these things strikes me as profoundly....whateverish. If he honestly rejects Roxy Music because he's discovered that Bryan Ferry hunts, I must admit I find that rather unappealingly and narrow-mindedly fanatical. Sticking to rigid principles that virtually no-one share is fine. Violently rejecting everyone who doesn't smacks of unattractive sectarianism. But this is Morrissey - witty, uncompromising, consistent and, um, let's call it other-worldly.
cheers
Oh so very well said.
Looks like I'm the only one who's appalled at Morrissey's words:
"I cannot use the him/her term in relation to a Prime Minister because, as we all know, Margaret Thatcher has ensured that a female Prime Minister would never again be risked." Ermmm... why?
If Margaret Thatcher had been a male Prime Minister and you wouldn't agree with anything he does and you'd think that he did great harm to the entire nation, would you say your country shouldn't risk another male PM? So isn't it the political views you confront, is it now the gender of the person?