Morrissey's friend forging new alliances

Again, he has not "earned his money by working". Certainly, he's accumulated millions that have been paid to him, but he has not "earned" those millions. I already responded to this point earlier, though, and you still have no substantive response to it (except to say you're personally offended) so I'll leave that with you.

Be as artistic as you like - I don't mind. Really, it's completely fine with me. If you can make a living from it and you enjoy it, that's even better.

You're right, though, Morrissey doesn't have to say explicitly that he's no longer a fan of For Britain and its policies. He doesn't have to publicly urge people to not "give them a chance", but since he doesn't say he doesn't support them anymore, there is no basis at all for you to claim that he doesn't support them.

Over the decades, there are very many issues and people about whom Morrissey has expressed opinions and then not mentioned them again. I don't think he's mentioned, say, Margaret Thatcher or Myra Hindley or even Barack Obama in a quite a while. If your argument held up, we would have to deduce from his silence that his opinions about them have changed - not just his opinions about For Britain. Suddenly, and without explanation, he likes Thatcher, Hindley and Obama now; he can't get enough of those milk-snatching, child-murdering non-black black people.

Can you see yet what's wrong with your argument?

The fact that he hasn't talked about For Britain recently cannot be construed as his having rejected them or their ideas. It's wishful thinking on your part, and on your part alone.

He earned it. He wrote, sang & giged. I don't know why you have difficulty grasping that.

He commented on Obama when he was in office & he managed to get Hindley AND Thatcher into a complaint when Thatcher died. The idea that Morrissey would quietly support someone instead of telling everyone why they're wrong is batshit.


I have listened and I have seen a lack of truth that we had dared not believe existed in modern Britain. Margaret Thatcher has left the order of the world, and she is not to blame for the reports of her own death – reports so dangerously biased and full of intolerant menace that we now wonder how we can possibly believe anything that has ever been recorded in British history books. The coverage by the British media of Thatcher’s death has been exclusively absorbed in Thatcher’s canonization to such a censorial degree that we suddenly see the modern British establishment as an uncivilized entity of delusion, giving the cold shoulder to truth, and offering indescribable disgust to anyone unimpressed by Thatcher. Even to contest Thatcher’s worth is termed “anarchist”, and this source of insanity – intolerant of debate, is spearheaded by the BBC reporting not on how things actually are on British streets, but on how they would prefer things to be. For those of us who survived despite Thatcherism, and who recall Thatcher as a living hell, The Daily Mail and The Guardian have a steadfast message for us: You are nothing. Our thoughts are further burdened by the taunting extravagance of Thatcher’s funeral; the ceremonial lavish, the military salute, stripping Thatcher’s victims of everything, and rubbing salt in wounds with teasing relish. It is all happening against us. In thought, we have killed Thatcher off a million times, but now that we have the reality of her death, the Metropolitan Police have set up new laws against us, and within paragraphs of law, we are not allowed to register our feelings so that anyone might overhear them. Echoes of Libya? Echoes of any Middle Eastern patch whose troubles are thought too uncivilized for a democratic England where chivalrous respect is afforded to “freedom”, and where we are all servile to “democracy.” It is, of course, The Big Lie. The fact that there will be such an enormous police presence at Thatcher’s funeral is evidence that her name is synonymous with trouble – a trouble she brought on herself. No one wished for it, or brought it to her, yet she created her subtle form of anarchy nonetheless. BBC News will scantily report on anti-Thatcher demonstrations as if those taking part aren’t real people. Lordly scorn is shown towards North Korea and Syria, and any distant country ruled by tyrannical means, yet the British government employs similar dictatorship tactics in order to protect their own arrogant interests. There will be no search for true wisdom this week, as the BBC gleefully report how Ding Dong the witch is dead “failed to reach number 1″, and they repeat the word “failed” four times within the brief report, and a shivering sovereign darkness clouds England – such identifications known only in China. There will be no report as to how “the British people have succeeded in downloading Ding dong the witch is dead to number 2″, and we are engulfed in Third Reich maneuvers as BBC Radio assume the role of sensible adult, finger-wagging at that naughty public who must not be allowed to hear the song that they have elected to number 2. By banning Ding dong the witch is dead (and only allowing four seconds of a song is, in fact, a ban) the BBC are effectively admitting that the witch in question can only possibly be Margaret Thatcher (and not Margaret Hamilton), even though Thatcher isn’t mentioned in the song, which is in fact a harmless, children’s song written over 70 years ago. Whilst the BBC tut-tut-tutted a polite disapproval at the Russian government for sending a “feminist punk” band to prison for recording an anti-government song, they engage in identical intolerance against Ding dong the witch is dead without a second’s hesitation. Thatcher’s funeral will be paid for by the public – who have not been asked if they object to paying, yet the public will be barred from attending. In their place, the cast are symbols of withering – as old as their prejudices, adroit at hiding Thatcher’s disasters. Ancestry and posterity, trimmed with pageantry, will block out anyone with a gripe. David Cameron will cling to Thatcher as she clung to the Malvinas, each in their last-ditch efforts to survive obscurity. Cameron achieves his own conclusions without any regard for the appalling social record of The Thatcher Destroyer – the protestors outside are simply not being British, or, even worse, are probably from Liverpool. When Cameron talks he is simply speaking his part, but he is adamant that the scorn Thatcher poured onto others should not be returned to her. Her mourning family must have considerations that were never shown to the families of the Hillsborough victims, and although Thatcher willingly played her part in the Hillsborough cover-up, let’s not go into all that now. Instead we’re asked to show respect for a Prime Minister whose own Cabinet were her rivals. Thatcher’s death gives added height to David Cameron (a Prime Minister who wasn’t actually voted in by the British people, yet there he is – reminding us all of our manners), and he does not understand how the best reason for doing something is because there’s nothing in it for you. The words of Cameron are assumed to have weight, yet his personal gain is the only reason why he speaks those words. Cameron tells us that the British people loved Thatcher, but we are all aware that Sunningdale and Chelsea are his Britain; he does not mean the people of Salford or Stockton-on-Tees, who are, in any case, somewhere north of Lord’s Cricket Ground. Can the BBC possibly interview someone with no careerist gain attached to their dribble? No. On the day that nine British citizens are arrested in Trafalgar Square for voicing their objections to the Baroness, the BBC News instead offer their opening platform to Carol Thatcher, a dumped non-star of I’m a celebrity get me out of here, and to Sir Mark Thatcher (Sir!), unseen since the disgrace of his involvement in selling arms to countries at odds with Britain (magically, he avoided a 15-year prison term and was financially bailed out by his mother – her moral conscience nowhere in sight as Sir Mark patriotically took his 64 million and fled to Gibraltar having been refused entry to Switzerland and Monaco. What kind of mother raised such a son?) Both Mark and Carol get the BBC spotlight because they mourn their mother’s death, whilst those honest civilians who mourn Thatcher’s life are shunted out of view. This is how we see Syrian TV operate, and this is most certainly NOT a week when David Cameron will advise: “hug a hoodie.” Whilst the quite astonishing social phenomenon of Ding Dong the witch is dead is ignored by the television news, instead we are shown an eight-minute clip of Psy, a funny little South Korean singer who is making all British newsreaders laugh with his funny little new video. Today, news items from South Korea, Belgium and China get precedence over homeland news of anti-Thatcher protests in Trafalgar Square, and the meaningless banality of Modern Media Britain casts a shameful shadow. Repeated and repeated, words strengthen. The truth sleeps as the heartlessness of Thatcher is re-written as a strength, for it was not exclusively because Thatcher destroyed the miners or murdered the boys of The Belgrano that we feel rage, but it was the lip-smacking relish with which she did both, and with which she sent armies of police to batter anyone who opposed her view. Gaddafi did the same thing in the same way. Thatcher could never show sympathy, or empathy, or understanding to those from whom David Cameron is now demanding a show of civil respect for a woman who, like Myra Hindley, proved to all of us that the female could be just as cruel as the male. By 1990 Thatcher was the gift that not even her own Cabinet wanted, and she was tufted out of office. How could such a catastrophic end warrant a statue in Trafalgar Square? Revenge was the vital juice of every move made by Thatcher, and her results produced the most dis-United Kingdom ever seen in history. Although Thatcher was never flesh, her demeanor took on an incurably demented sadness, and her broadcasting tones registered madness … as Britain burned. From all of this we see, in this April week of 2013, that modern media reporting in Britain is a disturbing fog of taboos and prejudices, reviving the divisions that Thatcher hatched, whilst hiding her horrors. Even in death, Thatcher remains ‘the enemy within.’

And the truth sleeps.

IMG_20210522_125136.jpg
 
He earned it. He wrote, sang & giged. I don't know why you have difficulty grasping that.

He commented on Obama when he was in office & he managed to get Hindley AND Thatcher into a complaint when Thatcher died. The idea that Morrissey would quietly support someone instead of telling everyone why they're wrong is batshit.


I have listened and I have seen a lack of truth that we had dared not believe existed in modern Britain. Margaret Thatcher has left the order of the world, and she is not to blame for the reports of her own death – reports so dangerously biased and full of intolerant menace that we now wonder how we can possibly believe anything that has ever been recorded in British history books. The coverage by the British media of Thatcher’s death has been exclusively absorbed in Thatcher’s canonization to such a censorial degree that we suddenly see the modern British establishment as an uncivilized entity of delusion, giving the cold shoulder to truth, and offering indescribable disgust to anyone unimpressed by Thatcher. Even to contest Thatcher’s worth is termed “anarchist”, and this source of insanity – intolerant of debate, is spearheaded by the BBC reporting not on how things actually are on British streets, but on how they would prefer things to be. For those of us who survived despite Thatcherism, and who recall Thatcher as a living hell, The Daily Mail and The Guardian have a steadfast message for us: You are nothing. Our thoughts are further burdened by the taunting extravagance of Thatcher’s funeral; the ceremonial lavish, the military salute, stripping Thatcher’s victims of everything, and rubbing salt in wounds with teasing relish. It is all happening against us. In thought, we have killed Thatcher off a million times, but now that we have the reality of her death, the Metropolitan Police have set up new laws against us, and within paragraphs of law, we are not allowed to register our feelings so that anyone might overhear them. Echoes of Libya? Echoes of any Middle Eastern patch whose troubles are thought too uncivilized for a democratic England where chivalrous respect is afforded to “freedom”, and where we are all servile to “democracy.” It is, of course, The Big Lie. The fact that there will be such an enormous police presence at Thatcher’s funeral is evidence that her name is synonymous with trouble – a trouble she brought on herself. No one wished for it, or brought it to her, yet she created her subtle form of anarchy nonetheless. BBC News will scantily report on anti-Thatcher demonstrations as if those taking part aren’t real people. Lordly scorn is shown towards North Korea and Syria, and any distant country ruled by tyrannical means, yet the British government employs similar dictatorship tactics in order to protect their own arrogant interests. There will be no search for true wisdom this week, as the BBC gleefully report how Ding Dong the witch is dead “failed to reach number 1″, and they repeat the word “failed” four times within the brief report, and a shivering sovereign darkness clouds England – such identifications known only in China. There will be no report as to how “the British people have succeeded in downloading Ding dong the witch is dead to number 2″, and we are engulfed in Third Reich maneuvers as BBC Radio assume the role of sensible adult, finger-wagging at that naughty public who must not be allowed to hear the song that they have elected to number 2. By banning Ding dong the witch is dead (and only allowing four seconds of a song is, in fact, a ban) the BBC are effectively admitting that the witch in question can only possibly be Margaret Thatcher (and not Margaret Hamilton), even though Thatcher isn’t mentioned in the song, which is in fact a harmless, children’s song written over 70 years ago. Whilst the BBC tut-tut-tutted a polite disapproval at the Russian government for sending a “feminist punk” band to prison for recording an anti-government song, they engage in identical intolerance against Ding dong the witch is dead without a second’s hesitation. Thatcher’s funeral will be paid for by the public – who have not been asked if they object to paying, yet the public will be barred from attending. In their place, the cast are symbols of withering – as old as their prejudices, adroit at hiding Thatcher’s disasters. Ancestry and posterity, trimmed with pageantry, will block out anyone with a gripe. David Cameron will cling to Thatcher as she clung to the Malvinas, each in their last-ditch efforts to survive obscurity. Cameron achieves his own conclusions without any regard for the appalling social record of The Thatcher Destroyer – the protestors outside are simply not being British, or, even worse, are probably from Liverpool. When Cameron talks he is simply speaking his part, but he is adamant that the scorn Thatcher poured onto others should not be returned to her. Her mourning family must have considerations that were never shown to the families of the Hillsborough victims, and although Thatcher willingly played her part in the Hillsborough cover-up, let’s not go into all that now. Instead we’re asked to show respect for a Prime Minister whose own Cabinet were her rivals. Thatcher’s death gives added height to David Cameron (a Prime Minister who wasn’t actually voted in by the British people, yet there he is – reminding us all of our manners), and he does not understand how the best reason for doing something is because there’s nothing in it for you. The words of Cameron are assumed to have weight, yet his personal gain is the only reason why he speaks those words. Cameron tells us that the British people loved Thatcher, but we are all aware that Sunningdale and Chelsea are his Britain; he does not mean the people of Salford or Stockton-on-Tees, who are, in any case, somewhere north of Lord’s Cricket Ground. Can the BBC possibly interview someone with no careerist gain attached to their dribble? No. On the day that nine British citizens are arrested in Trafalgar Square for voicing their objections to the Baroness, the BBC News instead offer their opening platform to Carol Thatcher, a dumped non-star of I’m a celebrity get me out of here, and to Sir Mark Thatcher (Sir!), unseen since the disgrace of his involvement in selling arms to countries at odds with Britain (magically, he avoided a 15-year prison term and was financially bailed out by his mother – her moral conscience nowhere in sight as Sir Mark patriotically took his 64 million and fled to Gibraltar having been refused entry to Switzerland and Monaco. What kind of mother raised such a son?) Both Mark and Carol get the BBC spotlight because they mourn their mother’s death, whilst those honest civilians who mourn Thatcher’s life are shunted out of view. This is how we see Syrian TV operate, and this is most certainly NOT a week when David Cameron will advise: “hug a hoodie.” Whilst the quite astonishing social phenomenon of Ding Dong the witch is dead is ignored by the television news, instead we are shown an eight-minute clip of Psy, a funny little South Korean singer who is making all British newsreaders laugh with his funny little new video. Today, news items from South Korea, Belgium and China get precedence over homeland news of anti-Thatcher protests in Trafalgar Square, and the meaningless banality of Modern Media Britain casts a shameful shadow. Repeated and repeated, words strengthen. The truth sleeps as the heartlessness of Thatcher is re-written as a strength, for it was not exclusively because Thatcher destroyed the miners or murdered the boys of The Belgrano that we feel rage, but it was the lip-smacking relish with which she did both, and with which she sent armies of police to batter anyone who opposed her view. Gaddafi did the same thing in the same way. Thatcher could never show sympathy, or empathy, or understanding to those from whom David Cameron is now demanding a show of civil respect for a woman who, like Myra Hindley, proved to all of us that the female could be just as cruel as the male. By 1990 Thatcher was the gift that not even her own Cabinet wanted, and she was tufted out of office. How could such a catastrophic end warrant a statue in Trafalgar Square? Revenge was the vital juice of every move made by Thatcher, and her results produced the most dis-United Kingdom ever seen in history. Although Thatcher was never flesh, her demeanor took on an incurably demented sadness, and her broadcasting tones registered madness … as Britain burned. From all of this we see, in this April week of 2013, that modern media reporting in Britain is a disturbing fog of taboos and prejudices, reviving the divisions that Thatcher hatched, whilst hiding her horrors. Even in death, Thatcher remains ‘the enemy within.’

And the truth sleeps.

View attachment 72983
Holy wall of text, Batman! For somebody as "literate" as Morrissey, why cannot he grasp the concept of paragraphs?

I'll read his undoubtedly edifying "statement" when I get time to wade through it.

On the part of your post that you actually wrote - I responded to this already and you could make no response. I explained my opinion, I think, as clearly as I could. I'm not sure how I might break it down further for you. He gets a shitload of money for doing precious little while people who make an actually valuable contribution to society get paid a lot less and comparatively little respect. That an entertainer should have millions of pounds in the bank for having penned some pop songs while, for example, many NHS staff rely on wage-subsidies (in the form of Universal Credit and Tax Credits) is an obscenity. This is a product of our class structure and Morrissey is perfectly happy with it.

As for the Thatcher/Hindley thing, Thatcher died eight years ago. If Morrissey hasn't complained about either Thatcher or Hindley in the last two years, then - according to your reasoning - we can safely assume that he likes them now. Can't we?
 
🤒
Magento cant get
sleep from nightmares,
the horses that haunt him:censored:
you would think with no
sleep he would fix the cardboard shutters but....🍻:hammer:
 
Holy wall of text, Batman! For somebody as "literate" as Morrissey, why cannot he grasp the concept of paragraphs?

I'll read his undoubtedly edifying "statement" when I get time to wade through it.

On the part of your post that you actually wrote - I responded to this already and you could make no response. I explained my opinion, I think, as clearly as I could. I'm not sure how I might break it down further for you. He gets a shitload of money for doing precious little while people who make an actually valuable contribution to society get paid a lot less and comparatively little respect. That an entertainer should have millions of pounds in the bank for having penned some pop songs while, for example, many NHS staff rely on wage-subsidies (in the form of Universal Credit and Tax Credits) is an obscenity. This is a product of our class structure and Morrissey is perfectly happy with it.

As for the Thatcher/Hindley thing, Thatcher died eight years ago. If Morrissey hasn't complained about either Thatcher or Hindley in the last two years, then - according to your reasoning - we can safely assume that he likes them now. Can't we?

He has to create a product that someone wants to buy - that has nothing to do with the class system & it's not accumulating cash through hogging resources or exploiting labour.

He had that picture of Thatcher about to get her head knocked off at his last gig.

She's trying to get elected & he's saying nothing. He doesn't stay silent about things he believes in.
 
Someone has to oversee the manure pit.
🤒
BGV, face it, youve been caught
siphoning off posts from the
readership:straightface:
its as true as its true that
Magento is currently on his 25th Hooboo 🍻:hammer:
 
🤒
Magento cant get
sleep from nightmares,
the horses that haunt him:censored:
you would think with no
sleep he would fix the cardboard shutters but....🍻:hammer:
If you want to be sea sick Steve’s
Banjo player, then you will have to keep your three foot beard in good nick...
It’s no good having bits of after birth pie all over it.....and last weeks possum stew dangling all down the front of it.....

Anyhow fake vegan Grandma will soon hose you and Cletus down in the creek .......along with the other 36 inbred, deformed and depraved specimens of a clan..🤪🤪🤪
 
:handpointup:
Magento (aka 'my one suit is magenta and maroon): off to bed 'soon':lbf:
TRANSLATION: 'will continue to be liquored up for the foreseeable future':hammer:
 
I can tell you now, she will crash and burn. The good people of West Yorkshire will tell her to f*** off, and her racist mates too.
this would be the same "good people" (batley/spen) who voted 60/40 in favour of Brexit?
 
Some of them, yes. And they don't like racist c***s turning up.
Look Skinny, you HAD to accept ‘brown folks‘ turning up on your Yorkshire council estate (your words not mine) stop counter transferring your anger to Morrissey. His family/ancestors were and subtly are, still victims of English Racism. Looking at your relentless campaign Is proof. Go express your inner rage positively, like …. something, if it helps. 🤡 You are the epitome of a hypocritical brainwashed dimwit. Has the next generation arrived yet? God help us. U C. L O L.
 
:lbf:
so now only cuck commie trolls can vote in yorkshire:crazy:
:hammer:
 
And he proudly wore his For Britain badge for some reason?
She's never been his friend. She's never met him. He didn't join her party. He hasn't mentioned her for 2 years. He first mentioned her in 2017, the same year he backed Jeremy Corbyn.

You're the disgrace - giving her publicity because you hate a pop singer.
This is a classic example of Karen going against someone who, yes is a dickhead and full-on M hater, but who knows a bit more about M's games than her.

It's true Morrissey did speak highly, of Jeremy C but he never ever backed Jeremy C . Karen is lying, straight-up lying.

You have to wonder about the mental illness around fans like Karen and they are many .
They are happy to let things go just because it's Morrissey. If Liam G. said this stuff they would call him out.
Its shocking and Karen is in her 40s (well the photo i saw of her she looked 40s) , she isn't some teenager.

I don't think Morrissey is a nazi, I think he is an uncle bigot type which, not perfect, is fine by me. The thing is though he DID Back AMW , not just wearing the badge of her party but also offered support on his website.
He has said he never back anyone before, again showing Karen is a liar, but he implored us to back AMW .

Personally, I don't care he can give them his support, I'd rather he hadn't but its his life to do with, his way .
 
This is a classic example of Karen going against someone who, yes is a dickhead and full-on M hater, but who knows a bit more about M's games than her.

It's true Morrissey did speak highly, of Jeremy C but he never ever backed Jeremy C . Karen is lying, straight-up lying.

You have to wonder about the mental illness around fans like Karen and they are many .
They are happy to let things go just because it's Morrissey. If Liam G. said this stuff they would call him out.
Its shocking and Karen is in her 40s (well the photo i saw of her she looked 40s) , she isn't some teenager.

I don't think Morrissey is a nazi, I think he is an uncle bigot type which, not perfect, is fine by me. The thing is though he DID Back AMW , not just wearing the badge of her party but also offered support on his website.
He has said he never back anyone before, again showing Karen is a liar, but he implored us to back AMW .

Personally, I don't care he can give them his support, I'd rather he hadn't but its his life to do with, his way .

Your tone is a little bit unstable, so I don't think we'll get much out of talking to each other...

But on the Jeremy Corbyn point - he did put out a statement a week before the General Election in 2017, that preferred Jeremy over Theresa.


20210226_001708.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your tone is a little bit unstable, so I don't think we'll get much out of talking to each other...
Translation: You're coming at me with logic and facts. In order to maintain my Belief System I will be forced to ignore you if you continue to use these tactics.
 
This is a classic example of Karen going against someone who, yes is a dickhead and full-on M hater, but who knows a bit more about M's games than her.

It's true Morrissey did speak highly, of Jeremy C but he never ever backed Jeremy C . Karen is lying, straight-up lying.

You have to wonder about the mental illness around fans like Karen and they are many .
They are happy to let things go just because it's Morrissey. If Liam G. said this stuff they would call him out.
Its shocking and Karen is in her 40s (well the photo i saw of her she looked 40s) , she isn't some teenager.

I don't think Morrissey is a nazi, I think he is an uncle bigot type which, not perfect, is fine by me. The thing is though he DID Back AMW , not just wearing the badge of her party but also offered support on his website.
He has said he never back anyone before, again showing Karen is a liar, but he implored us to back AMW .

Personally, I don't care he can give them his support, I'd rather he hadn't but its his life to do with, his way .
Karen has lied countless times on this site and been made to look an utter fool. She is as deranged, deluded and unstable as Auntie Skinny, but just in the complete opposite direction. They are both textbook examples of the dangers of spending vast chunks of your life glued to the worldwide web.
 
Karen has lied countless times on this site and been made to look an utter fool. She is as deranged, deluded and unstable as Auntie Skinny, but just in the complete opposite direction. They are both textbook examples of the dangers of spending vast chunks of your life glued to the worldwide web.

I haven't lied - & people who spend their time sniping at me as if it would matter that their preferred version of him isn't the one I think most likely are the more accurate example.

If he's an Uncle Bigot - then he wouldn't prefer Jeremy to Theresa, he wouldn't have mentioned George Galloway in the same sentence as Nigel Farage, there wouldn't be hundreds of references to animals while a few pull-quotes years apart have to be cobbled together to make the case his issue is immigration & it's bizarre to think Anne Marie's veganism wouldn't be the thing he zeroed in on just a year after he was thinking of standing as London Mayor with this as his platform:

Animal welfare groups cannot persist simply in order to continue to persist. There must be a governmental voice against the hellish and archaic social injustice allotted to animals in the United Kingdom simply because those animals do not speak English, otherwise millions of very caring citizens are greatly concerned about issues that no one is able to do anything about.

What animal protectionists need to say is very well worth saying and well worth hearing. But we cannot just sit around waiting for establishment enlightenment. The sanctimonious disaster of animal agriculture cannot be allowed to go on forever, because its widespread impact is hellish. Animals in dairy farms and abattoirs are very eager not to die, yet their bodies are torn apart while still alive as they are strapped beneath a blade. No outcome can justify this, and we cannot be happy with a society that allows it to happen, because such a society without compassion goes nowhere.

The abattoir is the modern continuation of the Nazi concentration camp, and if you are a part of the milk-drinking population, then you condone systems of torture. There is no such thing as humane slaughter, and if you believe that there is, then why not experience it for yourself? If animal serial killer Jamie Oliver feels so passionate about including ‘kid meat’ (young goat) into the human diet, would he consider putting forth one of his own kids (children) for general consumption? If not, why not? What makes such people have absolutely no forgiveness towards animals? What hate drives them? The meat industry, after all, shows no compassion towards the planet, towards climate change, towards animals, towards human health. It is diabolically contrived and is the world’s No 1 problem. It is also the No 1 issue stifled from any political debate, which, if anything, highlights its importance.

The slaughterhouse effectively means that none of us are safe. Just investigate the appalling effects of meat production on our climate, environment, fields, forests, lakes, streams, seas, air and space. Your eyes will pop. No bigger global disaster could possibly be devised. Social justice for animals is not much to demand, because we are only asking humans to think rationally and with heart, even if being unable to hunt foxes and shoot birds would leave the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family with nothing else to do.”

 
:censored:
same old trolls making new fake usernames. like when fungus splits in two:blushing:
now i have 2 top
trolls siphoning off me, both skinny and FC, who wants me stabbed in the neck:censored:,
making 'translations'.
yet there they are, like the annoying new troll 'janice louise' siphoning off my posts:hammer:
 
Your tone is a little bit unstable, so I don't think we'll get much out of talking to each other...

But on the Jeremy Corbyn point - he did put out a statement a week before the General Election in 2017, that preferred Jeremy over Theresa.


View attachment 73018
Bitch you the one who made yourself "traceable" should morrissey "wish to contact" you, and HE'S the one who sounds unstable???? How does that work????
 
Bitch you the one who made yourself "traceable" should morrissey "wish to contact" you, and HE'S the one who sounds unstable???? How does that work????

Ffs - it's a standard website contact form & I have zero expectation of it being of any interest to his crew but it's there for complaints.
 
Back
Top Bottom