Tirade against the NME on Morrissey Official FB by Peter Katsis

Appears to come from Peter Katsis. Appallingly written mess of a statement.

Link here:

Text here:

"The N.M.E. used to represent the underground.

Now they are becoming known as The Guardian of rock music.

They had to stop printing copies.

Not because no one buys magazines.

Print publications like Q Magazine and Kerrang! still exist, because they remember who they are.

But not N.M.E.

They forgot who they were.

And because they just aren’t cool anymore.

N.M.E. are also just full of shit.

And can’t even afford good writers to work for them.

They like to remind readers of all the past allegations of the year, despite their lack of any basis in fact, despite that they are just re-hashing stories over and over, old news, fake news, etc.

But they leave out their own old issues, of lawsuits lost, and legal battles that forced them to apologize to M in the past.

And they lie more than Donald Trump.

-N.M.E. asked no one from M’s camp for comment to their recent story.

-Haslam was never a Moz fan. He was a publicity hound who had a new book coming that no one cared about.

-We didn’t cancel our summer shows because of Haslam’s weak event, the protest that drew no people.

-Moz in not a racist.

None of M’s latino fans care about UK politics, but hell…..why not call them up and try and find a story where one doesn’t exist?

Not like they have anything real to write about……like music.

Because they don’t even know what music is anymore.

Basically all this points to the fact that writer(?) Bob Chiarito and his editors at N.M.E. have been relegated to meaninglessness.

Not really even worth writing about for this Facebook post.

We stand up for ourselves here, not because we give a shit anymore what these folks say…..

…..but to point out to the fans and music industry of the UK that they’ve changed their title.

Now N.M.E. stands for …….Now Mostly Excrement.

No longer of any value to the music community…. they have decided to be the TMZ of music news.

Good riddance. - PK"


Related item:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Oh my god. it's Robby!

spontaneously luminescent
Is it possible that Hitler - as an extremist - might have been attracted to elements of extreme left wing ideas, as well as elements of extreme right wing ideas? He clearly watched what Lenin, and then Stalin, did in the USSR and admired their use of state power. He clearly thought that global capitalism was corrupt and needed to be overthrown. He had very different ideas about what it should be replaced with, and clearly hated Marxism. But why does all this make people on the left so uncomfortable?
There was a leftist, all be it a rabidly racist one, strain within Nazism on its march to power, they were useful idiots to his cause, liquidated in 1934, along with high ranking homosexual members of the party, also useful for a time, but once in power, it became obvious to Hitler, if it wasn’t already before, that his dreams of conquest required the Junker military elite and the backing of Germany’s military industrial complex.
I honestly don’t believe he had any trouble chucking all these people Strasser(their leader) included so that he could begin the re-militarizion of Germany in earnest.
Stalin is a better example of succeeding at this, with Germans knocking on the Kremlins door, he relinquished much control of the Red Army to the likes of brilliant military men like Zhukov and other Cossack warrior caste figures for the duration of the war, then purged them in various ways afterwards...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strasserism

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgy_Zhukov
 

bhops

Last of the famous international screw ups.
There was a leftist, all be it a rabidly racist one, strain within Nazism on its march to power, they were useful idiots to his cause, liquidated in 1934, along with high ranking homosexual members of the party, also useful for a time, but once in power, it became obvious to Hitler, if it wasn’t already before, that his dreams of conquest required the Junker military elite and the backing of Germany’s military industrial complex.
I honestly don’t believe he had any trouble chucking all these people Strasser(their leader) included so that he could begin the re-militarizion of Germany in earnest.
Stalin is a better example of succeeding at this, with Germans knocking on the Kremlins door, he relinquished much control of the Red Army to the likes of brilliant military men like Zhukov and other Cossack warrior caste figures for the duration of the war, then purged them in various ways afterwards...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strasserism

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgy_Zhukov

Some thanks they got from Uncle Joe aye? :lbf:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Crime is endemic in Commie Countries. Everybody steals from their work. Cubans steal the cigars and sell it to tourist peeps on the streets. Everywhere the Commies get it its chaos and half the country tries to flee. Its a disaster, the Communism.
There is little crimes like burglary of houses because there is hardly anything to steal. You are also likely to disappear if you get caught, unlike the permissive Democracies.:thumb:
OMG, do you know that the wall felt down almost 30 years ago.....
You're living in the cold war aera yet, with the ideals from the 19th century..... pathetic
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Lets have Amazon double the pay of the workers
and have them pay 30 percent tax on top of that
you can probably buy a cup of coffee with the tax
proceeds seeing that nobody will be buying the 80
quid amazon cds.
ps probably have but one worker, someone to close to
shut the door right after they go broke.:crazy:
We seem to have a set of JMKs here.:lbf:
Are you communist?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Are you passively aggressively threatening her? And how dare you go back to your old usual tricks, of trying to "out" people on this site, when people perhaps don't need you in their faces, pulling this kind of inflated-ego, faux power trip over them.
Get a f***ing grip.
If I want to be in this forum, it's my right, even if i don't agreed with moz's ideals, I have the right to saying my point of views.
If in this forum, everybody was agreed with everybody.... Why this forum would still be open yet? Everyone would stay at home and try to live their life..... finally some would have no purpose in their life .... but it doesn't matter.

And leave people alone. And PARTICULARLY, leave vulnerable women alone.
Like said harvey weinstein, perhaps?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
There was a leftist, all be it a rabidly racist one, strain within Nazism on its march to power, they were useful idiots to his cause, liquidated in 1934, along with high ranking homosexual members of the party, also useful for a time, but once in power, it became obvious to Hitler, if it wasn’t already before, that his dreams of conquest required the Junker military elite and the backing of Germany’s military industrial complex.
I honestly don’t believe he had any trouble chucking all these people Strasser(their leader) included so that he could begin the re-militarizion of Germany in earnest.
If you speak about the SA, you do not know the history of germany at this period....
It's very simple to say that the SA was the leftlist of the nazis....
They were all agree with the fact to eliminated the politics, the trade unions, the religious (catholics, protestants, jews... all religious), the gypsys, slavic, the physically or mentally handicapped (some people in this forum was a close call), etc....
So dont tell that they were from the leftlist, not in the sense you think.
that reminds me a joke :
"What the difference between a taliban and a moderate taliban?
The taliban puts his wife in the trunk and the moderate taliban puts his wife int the trunk, but remove the spare wheel"
 

ExpectingToFly

Active Member
Is it possible that Hitler - as an extremist - might have been attracted to elements of extreme left wing ideas, as well as elements of extreme right wing ideas? He clearly watched what Lenin, and then Stalin, did in the USSR and admired their use of state power. He clearly thought that global capitalism was corrupt and needed to be overthrown. He had very different ideas about what it should be replaced with, and clearly hated Marxism. But why does all this make people on the left so uncomfortable?

I'm not sure why you think I'm being uncomfortable about this. I personally hate extremism on the left and the right, and I've already acknowledged that people on the left have also been responsible for mass killings and gross human rights abuses. As someone who considers themselves to be left wing, I'm quite willing to accept that Stalin, for example, was left wing. My point is that Hitler wasn't left wing, and to say so is historically illiterate. If anything, I'd suggest that people that come out with this statement betrays their own insecurities. Both sides of the spectrum have had their fair share of nutters, and it's also quite possible to be on the left or the right without being some sort of authoritarian, genocidal maniac.
 

reelfountain

On Timeout
When someone starts a sentence with “No offence, but...“ you can guarantee they're about to come out with something massively offensive.

I don't wholly blame Thatcher because the policy began under Labour. She accelerated it and every government since has failed to reverse it. Prescott did at least enable the building of a lot of social rented homes. I suppose it is a bit harsh of me to put any blame on the working classes because when you're from a poor background and you are offered an overnight money for nothing profit, who is going to turn it down?Although I do know one or two lefties who turned it down on principle.
Seeing as we're in the territory of making assumptions about people (I'm a liar/disingenuous/a leftie... None of which are true) you come across as a bitter paranoiac who thinks all his problems are due to a conspiracy by black people. No offence meant, of course.
That's where you're wrong. I actually believe black people (migrants from Africa of the last two decades or more) are being used as tools by the people engaged in the 'conspiracy'. Big difference. I have no personal grudge towards black people - but I do have a grudge against the elite who finance the NGOs shipping Africans into Europe and push for open borders (for everywhere but Israel) for their own power and monetary agendas. Oh yes. I find the elites destroyers of not only cultures but humanity. They want to eventually turn the working class into one de-raced homogeneous Soma-eating blob of serfs, each with the IQ of a single peanut. A minority of 'intelligent' and 'cultured' rich people ruling over the lowly masses.

If you go out and speak to Windrush blacks (of all generations) you'll find that a lot of them are actually anti-migrant. Some quite vociferously. They preferred London pre '97 before the floodgates were blasted open. You wont read that in the Guardian! (No, because to them all blacks are nice little victims that must be patted on the head and told how good they are).

The 'no offence' comment was humour - but I'm sure you know that (because yes, any sentence that begins with 'no offence' of course means the contrary)

Again, you can talk about official points systems for housing, but if migrants are always top priority for housing in London, how does anyone else get a look in? They don't. And that's how the 'conspiracy' works (if you want to call something that is almost completely open and blatant a conspiracy).

And yes, of course Thatcher knew the outcome of Right to Buy. It's a game of chess to these people.

I'll sign off with a quote from one of our betters (who always know best):

"Democracy is guided by the intelligent minority who know how to regiment and guide the masses." Edward Bernays, Propaganda (1928)
 
Last edited:
V

vegan.cro spirit# 112

Guest
OMG, do you know that the wall felt down almost 30 years ago.....
You're living in the cold war aera yet, with the ideals from the 19th century..... pathetic

o_O
Half of Venezuela and Cuba are out and about.
 
V

vegan.cro spirit# 112

Guest
Are you passively aggressively threatening her? And how dare you go back to your old usual tricks, of trying to "out" people on this site, when people perhaps don't need you in their faces, pulling this kind of inflated-ego, faux power trip over them.

Get a f***ing grip.

And leave people alone. And PARTICULARLY, leave vulnerable women alone.

GOOD EYE:eyes:
Iron Skinny Dzerzhinshy:openmouth:
 
V

vegan.cro spirit# 112

Guest
There was a leftist, all be it a rabidly racist one, strain within Nazism on its march to power, they were useful idiots to his cause, liquidated in 1934, along with high ranking homosexual members of the party, also useful for a time, but once in power, it became obvious to Hitler, if it wasn’t already before, that his dreams of conquest required the Junker military elite and the backing of Germany’s military industrial complex.
I honestly don’t believe he had any trouble chucking all these people Strasser(their leader) included so that he could begin the re-militarizion of Germany in earnest.
Stalin is a better example of succeeding at this, with Germans knocking on the Kremlins door, he relinquished much control of the Red Army to the likes of brilliant military men like Zhukov and other Cossack warrior caste figures for the duration of the war, then purged them in various ways afterwards...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strasserism

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgy_Zhukov

Wasnt the SA left wing AND even more anti JEW than the FUHRER himself? And werent they eliminated AFTER the Nazis were in power.:crazy: Wasnt Strasser a NAZI?
The Nazis came to power on a VERY LEFT WING AGENDA FFS its in all NORMAL NON POLLO NORMAL HISTORY BOOKS FFS:straightface:

Hitler didnt care about the homosexuals in the SA until they got out of line and started with the intrigues against him.o_O
 

StalinsPipe

Well-Known Member
If you speak about the SA, you do not know the history of germany at this period....
It's very simple to say that the SA was the leftlist of the nazis....
They were all agree with the fact to eliminated the politics, the trade unions, the religious (catholics, protestants, jews... all religious), the gypsys, slavic, the physically or mentally handicapped (some people in this forum was a close call), etc....
So dont tell that they were from the leftlist, not in the sense you think.
that reminds me a joke :
"What the difference between a taliban and a moderate taliban?
The taliban puts his wife in the trunk and the moderate taliban puts his wife int the trunk, but remove the spare wheel"

Well, they weren't leftists in the sense that they were socialists or communists, but they were Nazi leftists, in the sense that they were to the left of a rabidly right wing party. You're right in saying that Ernst Rohm and his SA followers didn't believe in things that leftists and the wider labour movement believe in, such as unions, democratic process etc.
 
Last edited:

StalinsPipe

Well-Known Member
'Smashing the state', LOL! Could you be any more of a cliché? Smash it all you like, but what will you do when you're placed in prison and non-whites start being deported and there's no state to protect you or them? There will be armed militias out in the streets shooting at each other. Try to disarm Bubba and he with his camouflage wearing buddies will hunt you down like The Most Dangerous Game. That's 'Sir Bubba' to you, by the way. He's made for that kind of stateless scenario, you're not. The fate of you and your comrades would be nasty, brutish, and short.

And guess what: after they begin deporting non-whites and the white population begins to show a healthy increase again, do you know what they'll do then? Re-establish the state. LMAO! And all your hard work will have been for nought.

But how little you realize, that the state being destroyed and replaced with something else is even less likely in our new multi-racial countries than it was in our relatively homogeneous countries of old. So don't worry, your dream/nightmare scenario will never come to fruition, and that's no one's fault but your own along with everyone else who encouraged mass immigration into our countries. So you'll have to get used to capitalism, big business, regulations, non-nationalized institutions, ethnic tensions, corruption, that's the future that you and your ilk set out for us.

The fact that you're allowed to "teach" anyone is a frightening thought, but it's not really "teaching" is it, you're just inculcating them with the same lies you were inculcated with. You really have no idea what the future has in store, do you? I always knew the left were short-sighted but this is just yet another stark reminder of it. Living in a total fantasy world, as I indicated earlier, your shallow view of history has left you with zero insight into the world we're living in. You're due a wake up call.

I don't believe I said "smash the state in that post", but that the state as it stands at the moment should be replaced with something better, and I think a lot of people, left and right, would agree with that. At the moment, the state doesn't serve the people as intended, despite us being the electors. I agree that the state should provide basic provisions like a decent health care system, a decent transport system, a welfare system, amongst others, but at the moment, in the UK at least, it isn't doing that very well, and in fact the government is constantly slashing the budgets of these essential services.

British democracy isn't working as intended, which is clear in the EU referendum, in which the official leave campaign broke campaign spending rules and a vocal minority in the parliamentary Tory party, who follow a sort of disaster capitalist ideology, is determined to take us towards something that even many people who voted leave didn't expect when they did so in June 2016.

The state doesn't need to be destroyed wholesale, but we do need to press reset on the whole thing and reinvigorate itbwith democracy and the ethos that the state exists to provide British citizens with essential public services.
 

StalinsPipe

Well-Known Member
Is it possible that Hitler - as an extremist - might have been attracted to elements of extreme left wing ideas, as well as elements of extreme right wing ideas? He clearly watched what Lenin, and then Stalin, did in the USSR and admired their use of state power. He clearly thought that global capitalism was corrupt and needed to be overthrown. He had very different ideas about what it should be replaced with, and clearly hated Marxism. But why does all this make people on the left so uncomfortable?

He only thought that Jewish capitalism needed to be overthrown, not German or Aryan capitalism. Hitler depended on the middle and capitalist class to come to power, and his rule very much benefited the very wealthy capitalists in Germany.
 
That's where you're wrong. I actually believe black people (migrants from Africa of the last two decades or more) are being used as tools by the people engaged in the 'conspiracy'. Big difference. I have no personal grudge towards black people - but I do have a grudge against the elite who finance the NGOs shipping Africans into Europe and push for open borders (for everywhere but Israel) for their own power and monetary agendas. Oh yes. I find the elites destroyers of not only cultures but humanity. They want to eventually turn the working class into one de-raced homogeneous Soma-eating blob of serfs, each with the IQ of a single peanut. A minority of 'intelligent' and 'cultured' rich people ruling over the lowly masses.

If you go out and speak to Windrush blacks (of all generations) you'll find that a lot of them are actually anti-migrant. Some quite vociferously. They preferred London pre '97 before the floodgates were blasted open. You wont read that in the Guardian! (No, because to them all blacks are nice little victims that must be patted on the head and told how good they are).

The 'no offence' comment was humour - but I'm sure you know that (because yes, any sentence that begins with 'no offence' of course means the contrary)

Again, you can talk about official points systems for housing, but if migrants are always top priority for housing in London, how does anyone else get a look in? They don't. And that's how the 'conspiracy' works (if you want to call something that is almost completely open and blatant a conspiracy).

And yes, of course Thatcher knew the outcome of Right to Buy. It's a game of chess to these people.

I'll sign off with a quote from one of our betters (who always know best):

"Democracy is guided by the intelligent minority who know how to regiment and guide the masses." Edward Bernays, Propaganda (1928)

A couple of quotes from Churchill:
"Democracy is the worst form of government, apart from all the others"

"The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter" :)
 

A scanty bit of thing

I only have eyes for youuuuuu, Aztec!
Where's the threat, dumbass? f*** off.
So now you need your own behavior explained to you, and spoonfed? I would say taking an anonymous poster’s comments, then calling them by NAME when they have just posted ANONYMOUSLY, to troll them for previous issues they may have and to say that you have “a very, very long memory” is a statement put forth on a public forum so as to to make an unspoken veiled threat - that you are inclined to publicly post more information about them again. It is also a statement intended to intimidate, and intended to shame. Dumbass.
 

countthree

Well-Known Member
Is it possible that Hitler - as an extremist - might have been attracted to elements of extreme left wing ideas, as well as elements of extreme right wing ideas? He clearly watched what Lenin, and then Stalin, did in the USSR and admired their use of state power. He clearly thought that global capitalism was corrupt and needed to be overthrown. He had very different ideas about what it should be replaced with, and clearly hated Marxism. But why does all this make people on the left so uncomfortable?

I wouldn't invest my time arguing about Hitler's ideology because he had none. He was a serial thief and a killer. He used the excuse of corrupt capitalism, the way his country was economically abused after WW1 and the poverty of his people as a mean to grab the power and form an army to expoliate another countries and communities. That is what most wars are about. Power and money, revenge and hate, except maybe independence wars.
 

669

Active Member
That rant against the NME is correct in all its points!

Not sure why the site allowed UncleSkanky to throw in his dumb opinion instead of just reporting the news and leaving the commentaries to the, you know, comment section. UncleSkanky still owes everyone an apology for (along with all the loony left Fake News outlets) being so wrong about the law when he backed that crooked, fascist judge chucking Tommy Robinson in jail for no legit reason and with no due process whatsoever. The reports are that Tommy Robinson was tortured and starved in that jail, and treated worse than terrorists at Guantanamo Bay. Why'd it take so long for a hearing before some proper judges? The UK has become a total disgrace to the Free World.
 

Trending Threads

Top Bottom