Morrissey sends statement criticising new book via nephew

Just spotted the article below on the Word magazine forum. It seems Morrissey's nephew turned up at the recent book launch in Manchester and read a statement by Morrissey criticising the book?

Did anyone see this?

Morrissey's nephew turns up at Morrissey book launch and upbraids author - The Word


Uncleskinny posted the following clarification in the original thread:

"Self appointed experts", "Dull as dishwater tribute band" - both utter knackers. I was there, know some of the panellists and the band were fricking great. Anyway, on to the salient point.

Morrissey's nephew was there, and did read a message from Morrissey. Far from pointing out "various factual inaccuracies in the book", it dwelt on one point only, in Chapter Eleven, which asked if Morrissey had pitch-controlled his voice on 'Skull'. That's what Morrissey picked up on when reading the book, and that's what his nephew read out. The statement made it clear that Morrissey had not altered his voice and went on to explain that singing in that high register was actually starting to damage Morrissey's vocal cords, hence the shift down for later live performances.

That's what happened. The article on the Word blog exaggerates things somewhat.

Oh, and the evening ground to a halt after that, because it was going to before. His statement was the last bit of the evening. Several people asked questions, the event was about to be wrapped up, Eoin said "Any more questions?" and then the statement. To suggest that the event was ended because of the statement and the 'ashen faced' panellists is plain wrong.

Update: 10am PT, Oct. 11: posted in the comments by punky:

On behalf of my co-editors (Aileen Dillane and Martin Power) and myself I have issued the following statement to the Word Blog concerning a report on the launch of our book at Waterstones, Deansgate, Manchester. I will not be making any further comment on the matter.

Dr. Eoin Devereux, co-editor.

"As one of the editors of the book referred to in this post I wish to point out the following factual errors.

1. Morrissey's nephew did read a statement referring to a SINGLE issue which he disagrees with in one of our book's chapters. He did NOT refer to "various factual inaccuracies" in the book.

2. The author was not ashen-faced as you report. The author who is a contributor to the edited book was not even present.

3. The night did not grind to a halt. There were more questions and even some humorous comments made following the statement referred to above. Book launch events usually finish with some questions and answers.

As someone who saw The Smiths play and is a lifetime Morrissey fan I and my colleagues are not, as you say, "self-appointed Morrissey experts". Your description of These Charming Men as being as 'Dull as Dishwater' is obviously an opinion not shared by the audience who clapped and cheered their 6 songs."

Related item:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Moz may only have criticized one particular factual inaccuracy, but criticism is rather faint praise, don't you think?
 
Sociology was one of the three subjects Morrissey studied at o-level, and his lyrics and comments testify to his enduring soft spot for this perspective. And the discipline is getting a tough rap:
...Q: What is your opinion on many of the non-experts who have been commenting?The first thing I would say is, one of the interesting things at the moment - precisely because of the politics of explanation and the desire to rule out any influence of the social and political context - the term sociologist has been elevated to about the level of jihadi, as about most pernicious thing that you can think of calling anybody. I feel great sympathy for sociologists, I must say. The second thing is that, often journalists are working very tight deadlines. They have to get hold of somebody so they will get hold of whoever is available. It doesn't have to be the best person, it's whoever is available. And the other thing is, of course, that what journalists want is news. They're not about truth they're about news. So they want somebody to say something controversial. If you look at a radio interview or a TV interview and they all agree and form a consensus, that's not interesting. In part, for logistical reasons, they don't get hold of the best people to speak, they get a hold of the easiest people to speak. And once they get hold of someone they know, they try to get them to speak on anything. One of the dangers is, once the media know you, they'll phone you about anything. I've had phone calls about the social psychology of [unintelligible]-you know, it's National [unintelligible] Week, or whatever. It's actually quite hard, for all sorts of reasons, to say no. But the second thing is, academics are sometimes lazy as well. They will talk, and they will offer opinions on things for which they are non-experts. Rightly, on the one hand, we have a responsibility to put our ideas in the public domain-we absolutely do. But at the same time, we need to restrain ourselves to talking about things where we have something distinctive to say which is based on a particular knowledge of the area. It's hard, sometimes, to limit yourself. When you have a charming journalist who invites you to go beyond the boundaries, it does happen. And that's quite flattering. Especially at an international level-if someone from another country phones you up there is that sense that, ‘oh, this makes me an international expert'. There are great temptations. We have to be very clear about the limits...
http://www.nature.com/scitable/blog/cognoculture/riot_redux_stephen_reicher_qa
 
"I Know It's Gonna Happen Someday" was altered, recently I don't know about "Skull" but "It's Not Your Birthday Anymore" in my opinion had work done. Relax Moz, everybody is at it!
 
I wish Morrissey would comment on the Peter Burn's interview in the Sept 27th issue of OK magazine. I agree with Pete, I hate lillies too.
 
This is the first time I've commented on this site, but I feel I should point out (since people are claiming that Moz never uses autotune) that the Live At The Hollywood Bowl disc that came with the Greatest Hits is unambiguously autotuned. Not that I have a problem with it.

Sad son,
You should go to this year EU tour, to see/hear Artist M with the best voice in the history of pop music.
Now, put your KID A mp3 and stay in pure idiot condition.

we'll let you know
 
Why are people being so abusive to anyone pointing out that Moz may use autotune? I mean, we'd all love to think that his voice is always perfect but come on. As someone that's worked in a studio I know of plenty of singers reknowned for their abilities that've used autotune plenty of times - sometimes if a take just has that special something, that great delivery and spirit but a few notes aren't right it's pretty common practice to stick autotune on to sort it out.

Also there's plenty of singers that don't realise that they get autotuned, they think they've done a perfect take but then once they've left a few tweaks are made and they pretty much never know so maybe Moz is one of those!

There are quite a few tracks on YOR that, to my ears, aren't pure uncut Moz, they do sound like they've had a little bit of help along the way. That's not to say he's not an incredible vocalist, he obviously is. It's just how it sounds to me.

* awaits abuse for simply stating opinion *
 
Why are people being so abusive to anyone pointing out that Moz may use autotune? I mean, we'd all love to think that his voice is always perfect but come on. As someone that's worked in a studio I know of plenty of singers reknowned for their abilities that've used autotune plenty of times - sometimes if a take just has that special something, that great delivery and spirit but a few notes aren't right it's pretty common practice to stick autotune on to sort it out.

Also there's plenty of singers that don't realise that they get autotuned, they think they've done a perfect take but then once they've left a few tweaks are made and they pretty much never know so maybe Moz is one of those!

There are quite a few tracks on YOR that, to my ears, aren't pure uncut Moz, they do sound like they've had a little bit of help along the way. That's not to say he's not an incredible vocalist, he obviously is. It's just how it sounds to me.

* awaits abuse for simply stating opinion *

Sad son,

You are confused.
You are dribbled by this tread-board theme.
You should by this ticket and go out to see Morrissey Live, ALIVE!
Then, you will know - he is THE GREATEST VOICE IN THE HISTORY OF POP MUSIC!
Sad son, this autopilot autotune subject is absurd. But, since you are never attend any Morrissey concert, since you have non of his records in your collection, apart from mp3 junk, you have to learn.

we'll let you know
 
Sad son

Hear, look, man, MAN, of 50 years is singing perfect song, LIVE - only Sinatra is his rival.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NK7Gz4THPbI

we'll let you know

I wouldn't say that was a perfect delivery and wise that he later tuned it down. In reference to 'I Know It's Gonna Happen Someday', listen to the studio version - I know you have it as you seem to like 'We'll Let You Know'. Why has it never been performed in that key live? Relax, they all do it!
 
What happened to the earlier comment about Peter Finan? That was the most entertaining post on this thread. Free speech and all that.
 
I wouldn't say that was a perfect delivery and wise that he later tuned it down. In reference to 'I Know It's Gonna Happen Someday', listen to the studio version - I know you have it as you seem to like 'We'll Let You Know'. Why has it never been performed in that key live? Relax, they all do it!

Sad son,

Obviously, you have never been at any concert from any pop/rock entertainer.
Obviously, because on concert is set of many songs they all alter mode Live performance from Studio performance.
Obviously, if you witness recent performances from Nick Cave, Jarvis Cocker, Brett Anderson, Bono... they all have a broken, cracked, destroyed voice after third, third song on the set. Now, this is Morrissey in full power in the middle of the set from recent tour:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1-b3pg7jN8
in 1.11 min do you hear this falsetto? Morrissey is THE GREATEST VOICE IN THE HISTORY OF POP/ROCK MUSIC. Full stop.
Well, so much about autotune.

we'll let you know
 
Well we've had the wilderness years, so from the stories I keep reading may I please name these present times for Morrissey!!!!
Ladies and Gents, Girls,Boys and Bart Simpsons (doh douche-bags) it gives me great pleasure to announce!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


THE BELLENDERNESS YEARS...........


Thankyou
 
Well we've had the wilderness years, so from the stories I keep reading may I please name these present times for Morrissey!!!!
Ladies and Gents, Girls,Boys and Bart Simpsons (doh douche-bags) it gives me great pleasure to announce!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


THE BELLENDERNESS YEARS...........


Thankyou

Yes son,

BELLISSIMA (Most Beatiful in Italian), BELLISSIMA time for Morrissey are here, are coming. Be prepared!

we'll let you know
 
Factual inaccuracy: in the blurb on the back it says "this important book makes for a rich reading of Morrissey"
 
Sad son,

Obviously, you have never been at any concert from any pop/rock entertainer.
Obviously, because on concert is set of many songs they all alter mode Live performance from Studio performance.
Obviously, if you witness recent performances from Nick Cave, Jarvis Cocker, Brett Anderson, Bono... they all have a broken, cracked, destroyed voice after third, third song on the set. Now, this is Morrissey in full power in the middle of the set from recent tour:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1-b3pg7jN8
in 1.11 min do you hear this falsetto? Morrissey is THE GREATEST VOICE IN THE HISTORY OF POP/ROCK MUSIC. Full stop.
Well, so much about autotune.

we'll let you know

But he never alters anything else from Your Arsenal when he plays it live, why just that song? Why? And what has 'Art Hounds', great number that it is, got to do with what we're chatting about - we're talking about studio manipulation and you post a track that doesn't have a studio version. Morrissey has a great unique style but don't be silly, the auto-tuning of his voice began as early as 1983 and that first Peel Session, which was why Johnny altered his guitar tuning soon after when it came to make the album for Mozza's benefit. Of course I don't need to tell a finely tuned ear like your own that the Peel Session versions of those Smiths songs and the eventually studio versions are tuned differently - you'd know this already.
 
Dear friend,

Basically, fine replay from your side. We put "Art hounds" to show how strong Morrissey Live is, so there is no need for some studio cooker.
Of course, every studio recording have a bit of sterilization, that by definition is studio recording.
But, fact is, Morrissey is the best, not just poet/writer in the history of pop/rock music, singer/voice in the history of pop/rock music (only Elvis is by him, but Presley didn't get to 52 years to hear him), and WE SHOULD CELEBRATE THAT!, and not to waist energy on gossip.

we'll let you know
 

Trending Threads

Back
Top Bottom