Musley, you've certainly made an impression with your ethical discussion threads recently! I avoided the euthanasia thread for my own reasons, but I feel compelled to participate here, even though animal rights aren't normally my schtick. For the record - I am against bullfighting, however, this looks like it's going to be a pretty one-sided (and therefore boring) discussion, so let me present the arguments in its favour. There is a slight problem in that these are pretty much non-existent, but I'll give it a go...
There is really only one pro-bullfighting argument, and that concerns heritage and national identity. Supporters argue that it is a deeply ingrained part of the Spanish national psyche - not just a sport, but an art to be judged by those deemed knowledgeable. It is often romanticised as a ritual, a dance-off if you will, between man and beast. The bull has the chance to survive if it performs well enough - it may be granted a 'stay' by the audience. There is also a fair chance of serious injury for the matador, particularly as the performance moves on and the bull becomes wiser to his intentions. It is dangerous for both parties, and each has a chance to live or die, depending on skill and style. In his book Death In The Afternoon (perhaps the ultimate glorification of bullfighting, but also a brilliantly romantic work), Hemingway says...
"Bullfighting is the only art in which the artist is in danger of death and in which the degree of brilliance in the performance is left to the fighter's honour."
For the Spanish people, bullfighting has a deeper resonance too. The sport's heyday during the Franco years were among the most disturbing and volatile in the country's history. The people turned to bullfighting as an outlet for the emotion and anger they felt towards the direction of their great nation. Obviously they could not publicly declare their dissenting views of the dictatorship, and so el toreo became a manifestation of these sentiments. Clearly that's no longer the case, but then it's not nearly as popular as it was 30 years ago. A 2006 IPSOS poll shows that 68% of people are against the practice, with 28% in favour. Compare that with a similar poll conducted in 1975, in which 55% of those polled described themselves as "enthusiastic" about bullfighting. However, in contrast to this seemingly liberal modern outlook, 76% of respondants in 2006 were against a banning of the sport. I think this reveals the fundamental problem for the Spanish - they might not agree with it, but banning it seems to them like erasing a key part of their culture and history. And surely they've suffered that shame for long enough?
Coiff.