Observer Moz Interview: Full transcript

G

Girl Drowning

Guest
Hey guys. Here is the Moz interview in today's Observer magazine, which I got off the website. I'm going to buy it later so I'll let you know about piccies etc. Enjoy!

GD

PS 2 days left!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sunday September 15, 2002
The Observer

The man with the thorn in his side

He has been rejected by the music industry, but still sells out the Albert Hall and can make Lynn Barber want to kiss his feet. We catch up with Morrissey in Colorado to talk about celibacy, feuding and why he doesn't do friends.

The Colorado Music Hall. How glamorous it sounds! How dismal it is! A bleak, concrete shed off the highway a few miles out of Colorado Springs, it looks as though it might have been built originally as a cattle pen. It has a neon sign outside, but the neon doesn't work - I can dimly make out MORRISY in straggling letters. In the foyer there is a long bar with people fighting for polystyrene beakers of beer; there is a trestle table with 'Morrissey Merchandise' which consists of an old poster and a few grey T-shirts. No one seems to be buying.
Backstage, Morrissey's dressing room is hardly more than a lavatory with a couple of plastic bags on the floor (there is no table) containing sliced bread. In his 80s heyday, with The Smiths, his contract used to stipulate that his dressing-room should contain vegetarian food, wine, fruit juice and 'flowers to the approximate value of £50 sterling, including gladioli, no roses or flowers with thorns' though later he replaced this with the demand for 'a live tree with a minimum height of 3ft and a maximum height of 5ft'. The tour manager used to carry a saw in his briefcase in case the tree provided was too tall. But there is no tree in tonight's dressing-room.

Morrissey's set begins with a recording of John Betjeman reading his poem A Child Ill, which might as well be in Urdu for all the impact it makes. Morrissey wanders onstage, looking portly in a long, brown cardigan. A few fans in the front cheer, but most of the audience are still milling round buying beer. Then he sings - and suddenly I see the whole point of Morrissey which was a mystery to me before. He is amazing - not just the lyrics and the voice, and the weird barks and yelps - but also his strange movements, the diva-like caressing of his body, the writhing on the floor, the almost Greta Garbo way he arches his neck. It is wildly camp, insanely provocative for Hicksville, USA. When he sings his vegetarian anthem, 'Meat is Murder', you think all these beef-fed cowboys in the audience might rush the stage and kill him. The grandeur, the sheer courage of his performance, completely transcends the dinginess of his surroundings. I am quite seriously tempted to run onstage and kiss his feet.

I had been warned that Morrissey could be flakey and difficult. But when I'd interviewed him earlier in the day, I found him exceptionally polite, friendly and tolerant of my ignorance of pop music. He went to great lengths to explain to me why Jarvis Cocker was not a patch on him - basically, he said, because he can't sing - while also claiming that he never listened to Pulp. He made good jokes, including jokes against himself. When I asked why he was so anti drink and drugs, he said, 'It's really self control, isn't it? I don't mind getting drunk, but it's not something I do very often. I mean - I am quite human. From a distance.'

He is 43 and looks it - a bit thickening around the middle, a bit greying at the temples. He is wearing a denim suit so ludicrously tight and pintucked it must be by some famous designer, but otherwise he seems quite normal. He has a Manchester accent and a dry Mancunian wit, but he also often says 'Bejaysus!' which presumably he gets from his Irish parents. He explains that he is in the middle of a three-month tour, going round American towns, then to England for two concerts at the Royal Albert Hall, and on to Australia and Paris. He likes to tour, he says, because he likes singing in front of audiences - simple as that. He admits that Colorado Springs is a bit off the beaten track, but 'I think it's a test of one's own private strengths that you can go to the more obscure markets.'

His career is at an odd point. He always tells the British press that he is 'big in the States' but actually no one I met in the States had even heard of him. On the other hand, his two concerts at the Royal Albert Hall next week are fully sold out, which suggests that he still has a good fan base in the UK. But are these merely old Smiths fans, still holding the torch? He says not - he says he attracts teenagers who were barely born when The Smiths were around. But if so, it's a bit of a mystery how he gets them because he hasn't had a recording deal since 1996, when Mercury signed him for three albums, but dropped him after the first.

He still goes to see record companies in search of a deal: 'But they all ask me how much I'm prepared to compromise, and I say "Nothing." One company said, "Yes, we'll sign you, but we'd like you to make an album with Radiohead" - which doesn't mean anything to me. And several labels have said, "Yes, we'd like to sign you but we don't want to sign your musicians." There's always some absurd condition which makes absolutely no sense. And all the labels in America have said: "Will your music fit in with what is successful in the American charts?" To which I reply: "Bejaysus, I hope it doesn't!" And then I'm out on the street immediately. If you saw me at those meetings, you'd feel really pitifully sorry for me.'

So no record deal then. Which means no radio play. Which means no new fans. Which means that his career - which already looks pretty flakey in Colorado Springs - is bound to dwindle. Of course at present, he still gets a good income from The Smiths royalties but he admits, 'I don't know whether it will keep rolling in - it's not for me to say. I don't really try to make anything happen - I don't force anything at all. I don't feel that I'm in the midst of a career and I don't feel good grief, I must make money - that never occurs to me. Everything evolves quite naturally, as if some unseen guiding hand is in the background.'

Anyway, he can still afford to live very comfortably. He has a house in Ireland, but for the past four years he has lived in Los Angeles, off Sunset Boulevard, in a house that was built by Clark Gable for Carole Lombard. When I ask if he lives next door to Johnny Depp, as the press always says, he corrects me, 'No - he lives next door to me.' Los Angeles suits him, he says, because 'it's a particularly sexless city. Everybody's bodies are so sanitised, so caked in every conceivable exfoliation, cologne and mousse, they have no trace of any kind of sexuality, nothing real and earthy. So I blend in very well!'

Nowadays he is a fairly rare visitor to Manchester - he pays flying visits to see his mother, sister, and father who all live in the area, but never for very long. 'I feel a cavalcade of very strange emotions when I go there - a city that turned me away and then accepted me under very peculiar circumstances. When I was a teenager it was always very difficult. At the age of 12, I would go and see David Bowie and Roxy Music, and that's very young to be wandering about Manchester by yourself. I saw all the important concerts at the time, but it was a very solitary experience, there was no gang, no camaraderie, no union of any kind. Nobody really understood the music that I liked. People forget how austere the early 70s were. There weren't that many people who would confess to liking David Bowie, let alone the New York Dolls, certainly not among the hard cases of Manchester.'

He was a classic bedroom pop obsessive, but of course even more obsessive than most. From the age of 10 he bought all the music papers and would be 'inconsolable' if one of them was missing. He also wrote endless nitpicking letters - sometimes 30 a day - to the NME and other music papers, correcting their mistakes and lambasting their opinions. Before he was even a teenager, he was a walking expert on pop music. 'I never fell in love with people or places: I always fell in love with 7in singles. I took pop music very seriously. I thought it was the heart of everything, I thought it affected everybody and moved everybody. It started me as a person. As a child I would sing every single night - and the neighbours would complain - because I had this insane desire to sing. I was obsessed with vocal melody - and remain so. So it's been a lifetime's preoccupation really. And at the expense of everything else you could possibly name.'

But despite a brief involvement with a group called The Nosebleeds, it seemed he might be singing to his bedroom wall for ever. Until, in 1982, Johnny Marr walked into his life. Marr was four years younger than Morrissey, but already had good contacts in the Manchester music scene. Morrissey showed him the lyrics he had written; Marr set them to music; they went out and hired two other musicians, called themselves The Smiths (an odd choice of name, given that most of them had Irish parents) and within a year they were famous. 'It was a very overnight success,' Morrissey agrees. 'And to step from the huddled shyness of my life - I had never had a life, I had never had a bank account, or a car - and to be the one stepping forward, explaining this magnificent game plan, which only ever existed in my head, was a fantastic learning process.'

In their five-year reign, The Smiths produced five bestselling albums and 14 hit singles. It was, as Morrissey says, 'a very, very pure success story'. But in 1987, Johnny Marr announced that he was leaving and that was the end of The Smiths. Morrissey was devastated - it came out of the blue as far as he was concerned. He has not seen Marr since, except in court, and claims he has no desire to see him. 'Why would you want to see someone who'd said bad things about you? It doesn't occur to me. He's never said anything nice about the solo music I've made. And he knows that at the end of The Smiths I was in a very depressed state - and that possibly the fact that he broke The Smiths up could have killed me. But, instead, I triumphed somewhat - and he's never said well done.'

Morrissey claims 'nobody was more surprised than I was' when he successfully started a solo career. His first album, Viva Hate, was a hit. But then successive albums did less well, and his last one, Maladjusted, hardly sold at all. It didn't help that he kept switching managers, and walked out of a tour with David Bowie in 1995. His then assistant Jo Slee said it was because 'he was very ill with depression. He was coming apart at the seams.' But Morrissey says it was because Bowie kept badgering him to sing one of his songs.

And then there was the court case. I made the mistake of raising the subject by asking - in passing, I thought - whether he'd now settled his long-running lawsuit with Mike Joyce, the former Smiths bass player. Suddenly Morrissey was off, galloping into a monologue which became increasingly weird as it went on. He said he'd 'never come face to face with human evil' until he encountered the judge, John Weeks. He uses the name John Weeks like an incantation or a curse.

The court case arose because, after The Smiths ended in 1987 and Morrissey and Marr went their separate ways, the two other Smiths, Andy Rourke and Mike Joyce, began thinking they'd been underpaid, in that they only got 10 per cent of The Smiths earnings, instead of 25 per cent. (This is performing royalties, not composing royalties, to which obviously only Morrissey and Marr were entitled.) The situation was complicated because Joyce and Rourke had never had a contract - in fact, legally, they didn't exist. Anyway, Rourke and Joyce sued Morrissey and Marr for back earnings. Rourke soon dropped out, but Joyce persisted and the case came to the high court in 1996. Summing up in favour of Joyce, the judge pronounced Morrissey 'devious, truculent, and unreliable' and ordered him and Marr to pay Joyce £1.25m in back earnings. Marr paid up, but Morrissey pursued the case to appeal - where it was dismissed.

Obviously it must have been a blow - but it was six years ago, you'd think Morrissey would have got over it by now. Ha! 'It was an extraordinary miscarriage of justice,' he rants. 'The whole point of this court case was to say Mr Joyce is a poor shambolic character in desperate need of money who has been treated abysmally by Morrissey and Marr - when the fact was he had been treated with absolute generosity, considering the minor role that he played. He played his instrument and went home. He was always in search of more shags. Now Johnny Marr and myself, throughout the history of The Smiths, never slept with anybody, and took The Smiths very seriously. We stayed up till the small hours perfecting and shaping everything. Joyce was the exact opposite - he had no sense of duty. So when this person therefore, 10 years after the group has ended, starts demanding £1m...'

Marr and Morrissey were in court together, but didn't speak except through their lawyers. At the end, Marr accepted the judgement ,but Morrissey took the case to appeal where he fared no better. 'You go to the appeal court and you come across three judges who are the same age, colour, background, demeanour, as the judge about whom you are complaining. And their attitude is, "How dare you disagree with one of our friends?"' So Morrissey complained to the Prime Minister, the Queen ('Tony Blair was not at all interested; the Queen was very nice'), the Lord Chancellor, the ombudsman, the Law Society, the Bar Council - 'But they just collect complaints in order to protect the judges.' Joyce meanwhile put a charge on Morrissey's mother's house and his sister's house, (presumably because Morrissey has no property in the UK) which makes them unsellable until the claim is settled.

Morrissey is now taking the case to the European Court of Human Rights, though he admits it is costing him a fortune - 'because with each new solicitor that I get to defend me, they view the overall situation and find it so extraordinary that they immediately place a bill before me for 100 grand before they do anything'. Wouldn't it be healthier, saner and cheaper just to cut his losses? 'No. I will never give up. I will fight till the last fibre of my body is spilled. I will go down with the ship. And my mother as well. We will never be beaten, not at all, because we have right on our side.' But meanwhile, the case seems to be blighting his life. 'No. it has strengthened my resolve. I'm not shrivelled up in a box in Manchester surrounded by empty beer bottles. They're going to have to fight long and hard to bring me down.'

Phew. I'm sorry I ever raised that subject because it was half an hour of almost undiluted venom. And I noticed later, when Morrissey's assistant Blossom asked what we talked about and I told her, 'The court case quite a lot', her face fell. I bet all his friends - not that he has any friends according to him - know not to press that button. Anyway, I was glad to change the subject and ask about his nonexistent love life, which he always seems happy to discuss.

Does he have relationships ever? 'Not physical relationships, no. I mean there are some people on this planet who aren't obsessed with sex, and I'm one of them. I'm not interested. And I'm not cloaking something, I'm not going somewhere under cover of night and existing in some wild secretive way. I wasn't interested when I was 17, I wasn't interested when I was 27, I was less interested when I was 37 and I'm even less interested now. I really enjoy my own company enormously, so I don't feel a great gaping hole. I sit at home at night and I feel absolutely honoured not having to cater for anybody, or listen, or put up with anybody. I feel it's a great privilege to live alone.'

Who is his best friend? He laughs derisively, 'My best friend? At the age of 43? My credit card!' Not even a cat? 'No. My best friend is myself. I look after myself very, very well. I can rely on myself never to let myself down. I'm the last person I want to see at night and the first in the morning. I am endlessly fascinating - at eight o clock at night, at midnight, I'm fascinated. It's a lifelong relationship and divorce will never come into it. That's why, as I say, I feel privileged. And that is an honest reply.'

I believe him. But given his admitted self-obsession, it seems extraordinary that he is in an industry like pop music, which by definition entails being popular and communicating with other people. 'Yes,' he agrees. 'It's an enormous contradiction really. But the fluffy elements of pop stardom, if you like, are not why I'm here. I'm generally very interested in the written word and changing the poetic landscape of pop music, and I think I've achieved that. I think, with The Smiths, I introduced a harsh romanticism which has been picked up by many people and which didn't exist previously. And it's nice to be a curious footnote to the whole story of British popular music. And not to be compliant, smiling, bland.' And with that, he goes off, smiling, to his concert at the Colorado Music Hall, where I suddenly - too late - discover the point of Morrissey.

· Morrissey is at the Royal Albert Hall on 17 and 18 September.
 
thank you, Girl Drowning!! Must rush out and buy the Observer now!! 2 days to go! Jx
 
I have photos now but I don't know how to upload them onto here!

On reading it properly, I'm gutted at how bitter he is, and how he's still obsessed with the court case. Get over it! Gorgeous photo tho....

GD
 
Re: great story

> but I don't feel sorry for him though...

Morrissey is a product of his own invention.
 
Caricatures, Rick & Bruce etcetera

I think there's only one photo that I think is new - and maybe that was taken some years ago (blue shirt, smart trousers). I was pretty surpised to see that the main full-page picture is a cartoon style drawing of Morrissey in denim shirt looking all Desperate Dan in an American desert (the painted desert?).

I don't think it's very flattering. A photo would have been much better. Theses Sunday supps usually have goregous looking people in them and Moz would be the best subject. I love that full-face b&w picture that (I think) was in the Mail on Sunday 7/8 years ago. That was beautiful.

But the vitriol unleashed when Lyn Barber pressd the court case 'button' the is, I think, perfectly understandable. I now have even more sympathy for Morrissey. I agree with him. Why should Rick Joyce be handed £1 million +++ because he was the drummer in The Smiths? When I listen to Morrissey solo I don't have much of a clue, exept through familiarity, who is playing drums. Ask me "Who played drums on Piccadilly Palare" and I would have to say I have no idea. I only know Rick Joyce was the drummer in The Smiths because he was the only drummer in The Smiths.

That Rick Joyce now seems to have some sort of hold over Morrissey's mother's house and his sister's too is extraordinary and absolutely UNFORGIVABLE.

It seems that if Morrissey had property in the UK then Joyce would be after that too which makes me think that this is at least some of the reason Moz has moved to LA. But then again I don't want to think that Rick Joyce (or whatever his name is) has run Morrissey out of the country.

Interesting to read that Morrissey returns to England to visit his mother and sister and particularly his father.

I love the quip about Johnny Dep - Morrissey is quite right. How come more people don't have resppect?

> I have photos now but I don't know how to upload them onto here!

> On reading it properly, I'm gutted at how bitter he is, and how he's still
> obsessed with the court case. Get over it! Gorgeous photo tho....

> GD
 
> I feel so sad reading this.

doesn't morrissey also consider the fact that these lawyers that he's going to are probably thinking "hell, this case doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell, but the money sure is good"? why go broke feeding the mouths of leaches?

they aren't going to be honest with him. its the sad truth. they'll take his money AND leave with no change in judgment. and they already know he'll be paying Mike and that's why they're asking for money up front. that whole line over "this is extroardinary and we need cash" is complete bullshit. most lawyers don't get paid unless judgment is in their favor and they can already smell it a mile away that it won't win.

they are all going out and having a drink in celebration that they are representing a big name with a large checkbook and they can use this as leverage to get more money out of their other clients since they've now hit "the big time"

and it has nothing to do with who is right and wrong at this point.
 
> I feel so sad reading this.

you know what though,
morrissey is really a mix of a dreamer and a realist without neccesarily contradicting each other.
morrissey is not going to get over that court case or even go through the motions of pretend he's over it.
he's pissed, and rightly so.
his music was a watershed and not one music exec, jackal was smart enough to see that.
to me, all other music is subsidiary - MOZ IS KING
it's kinda like Roundabouts. they work fantastically in Europe
but American's would never go for it (much to my chagrin) - you know why? they are impatient fools - SAME AS THE RECORD INDUSTRY.
could you imagine dealing with those inept, music types (whose only real qualifications is that of HEAD USHERETTE)
IT'S TIME TO UNFROCK THE MUSIC INDUSTRY
MORRISSEY MAY BE NEGATIVE BUT HE'S STILL THE UNRIVALLED VIRTUOSO!
 
> you know what though,
> morrissey is really a mix of a dreamer and a realist without neccesarily
> contradicting each other.
> morrissey is not going to get over that court case or even go through the
> motions of pretend he's over it.
> he's pissed, and rightly so.
> his music was a watershed and not one music exec, jackal was smart enough
> to see that.
> to me, all other music is subsidiary - MOZ IS KING

but the thing is, it seems these days that morrissey is getting fulfillment beating himself over the head over lost causes.

he is offended that the large record labels ask him to change musicians or do whatever it is they want him to do, yet, like a masochist, he keeps chasing after them instead of taking a smaller label who would support his decision and give the middle finger to the others. after 5 years of talking to them all, he presses on and its like getting blood out of a turnip.

he is keeping this court case open like a gaping wound, sinking to even ask the Queen for help in it despite his lack of respect and hatred for that institution and throwing his money at money grubbing lawyers (and you know deep down he knows they are after his money or he wouldn't complain they are out to "make a name for themselves") but once again, he'd rather feed the mouths of several people who happily carve him up for their own use rather than just go ahead and pay it off and be free to live the rest of his life.

its a running theme. I know its his refusal to compromise. and in a way, you respect that, but the thing is, if he doesn't relent a little, he'll be left with nothing. He'll still have no record contract and he'll still end up having to pay Mike plus a zillion bucks in court costs.

its almost like he had a bit of a breakdown after he lost the case in '96 and his label the year after that and is trying to draw all of it out because he's still very angry and he wants to have as many targets available to punch as he can. getting a deal or winning the court case is no longer the main objective of why he's still going. I think he's gotten to the point that he likes to go to the record company meetings just to be an ass to them. I think he's trying to work through his anger and doesn't really know how to do it.

I suppose a better analogy is like a rape victim who wants to take out their abuse on all men everywhere.

he's the pole vaulter that has set the bar to about 100 feet high and keeps trying to vault over it for 5 years straight and having no success. after a while, you have to question why he keeps trying it when the odds are nearly impossible.
 
what an interesting article! thank you for sharing it.

i dont feel sorry for morrissey, but that is only because i dont think he wants my pity.
 
but, correct me if i'm wrong... didn't the article say that Morrissey appealed, and then the case was dismissed?

that would mean that Morrissey didn't have to pay Mike Joyce, right?
 
> what an interesting article! thank you for sharing it.

> i dont feel sorry for morrissey, but that is only because i dont think he
> wants my pity.

suzanne,
i agree with you - "Morrissey" is Morrissey's own worse enemy.
it doesn't have to be that way, but yes,
sadly he does choose this glutton like punishment.
Morrissey just needs a sounding board for his intellctual prowess, and rhetoric (we're all he has)
he tries to hang on as life pulls him along (albeit unwillingly)
i think what Moz wants more than anything is EMPATHY
and unfortunately, he'll never get that from the Music Industry
Mainstream America rarely understands anything other than mediocrity
and the music industry only see Vacous, Insincere, Ineluctable, mind numbing, subordinate, Provincial, Pimps (who by the way have the rhythming ablitities of that of my 6 year old nephew) with $$$$$$$ in their eyes.
 
> but, correct me if i'm wrong... didn't the article say that Morrissey
> appealed, and then the case was dismissed?

> that would mean that Morrissey didn't have to pay Mike Joyce, right?

no, it said that the appeal was rejected and he's taking it to the European Courts.
 
Totally agree about Morrissey's apparent bitterness although Lynn Barber could be exaggerating. I think he should move on because legal stuff is so stressful. I can't imagine how it must feel living with it hanging over you for years. However, if he wants to appeal, good luck. I hope it all gets sorted out and he can get on with what he does best - making great pop records.

The oddest thing about the interview was the stuff about him writing to Tony Blair, the Queen, the Lord Chancellor etc about the case and him saying "The Queen was very nice about it." Did anyone else notice that??
 
He Lost The Appeal

the APPEAL was dismissed... he still owes Mike the $$$ - that's why Mike has a lien on his Mum's and Sister's houses in the UK (they are in his name)

... it's REALLY ugly- in America Mike Joyce never would have won the case- buut in the UK they have what amounts to a "STUPID IDIOT LAW" wich favors people like Mike Joyce who were not aware that they didn't have a real contract- there is no such protection here in the States.

I don't think either party is "right" or "wrong" .. you could say that Mike and Andy should have been HAPPY to be getting 10% of the performance royalties - most musicians get ZIPPO for their efforts... and you could also be the Devil's Advocate and say thay that they worked as hard onstage as Marr and Moz and be paid 1/4 of those same performance royalties because without a Rythym section those performances would have been reduced to fantastic accoustic "Unplugged" sessions...

It is rumoured that Andy Rourke settled out of court yrears ago for about $100,000 and promptly put it all into his arm and is now broke again. Mike Joyce rode it out for 10 years and won and is now villified by Moz and most of his fans. Marr paid his half to him and says their relationship is fine and that merely "business is business" and left it at that.

It's none of my gawddamn business but I really hope Morrissey and Joyce come to some sort of agreement OUT OF COURT and bury the horrible hatchet.

That's my humble opinion.

---

> but, correct me if i'm wrong... didn't the article say that Morrissey
> appealed, and then the case was dismissed?

> that would mean that Morrissey didn't have to pay Mike Joyce, right?
 
Re: He Lost The Appeal

> the APPEAL was dismissed... he still owes Mike the $$$ - that's why Mike
> has a lien on his Mum's and Sister's houses in the UK (they are in his
> name)

> ... it's REALLY ugly- in America Mike Joyce never would have won the case-
> buut in the UK they have what amounts to a "STUPID IDIOT LAW"
> wich favors people like Mike Joyce who were not aware that they didn't
> have a real contract- there is no such protection here in the States.

> I don't think either party is "right" or "wrong" ..
> you could say that Mike and Andy should have been HAPPY to be getting 10%
> of the performance royalties - most musicians get ZIPPO for their
> efforts... and you could also be the Devil's Advocate and say thay that
> they worked as hard onstage as Marr and Moz and be paid 1/4 of those same
> performance royalties because without a Rythym section those performances
> would have been reduced to fantastic accoustic "Unplugged"
> sessions...

> It is rumoured that Andy Rourke settled out of court yrears ago for about
> $100,000 and promptly put it all into his arm and is now broke again. Mike
> Joyce rode it out for 10 years and won and is now villified by Moz and
> most of his fans. Marr paid his half to him and says their relationship is
> fine and that merely "business is business" and left it at that.

> It's none of my gawddamn business but I really hope Morrissey and Joyce
> come to some sort of agreement OUT OF COURT and bury the horrible hatchet.

> That's my humble opinion.

f*** that punk
wasn't it said by morrissey that he and marr always considered the other two as "readily replacable as lawnmower parts"
he's a piece of shit to put that lien on his mum and sisters homes
f***ing bastard - he's just riding on morrissey's name.
think about it. if you slaved over the lyrics as moz did
would you really think, "mmm ya, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4"
have you ever read any of the Joyce or Rourke comments/quotes?
they are about as intelligent as my pinky finger
he's out for himself and he expected morrissey to buy into it.
Marr just paid to shut the f***er up -
morrissey's not that easy to pull the wool over. he knows who did what
YOU CAN'T BULLSHIT A BULLSHITTER!

> ---
 
To The Bitter End

I definitely see the argumants for both sides... remember: Joyce did not want any SONGWRITING royalties- only the PERFORMANCE royalties- they are separate... Maybe he should have just accepted the 10% that he got... but it really doesn't matter what I or the other fans think- he felt he deserved 25% and a "senile and vile" judge agreed with him.

> f*** that punk
> wasn't it said by morrissey that he and marr always considered the other
> two as "readily replacable as lawnmower parts"
> he's a piece of shit to put that lien on his mum and sisters homes
> f***ing bastard - he's just riding on morrissey's name.
> think about it. if you slaved over the lyrics as moz did
> would you really think, "mmm ya, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4"
> have you ever read any of the Joyce or Rourke comments/quotes?
> they are about as intelligent as my pinky finger
> he's out for himself and he expected morrissey to buy into it.
> Marr just paid to shut the f***er up -
> morrissey's not that easy to pull the wool over. he knows who did what
> YOU CAN'T BULLSHIT A BULLSHITTER!
 
Re: To The Bitter End

> I definitely see the argumants for both sides... remember: Joyce did not
> want any SONGWRITING royalties- only the PERFORMANCE royalties- they are
> separate... Maybe he should have just accepted the 10% that he got... but
> it really doesn't matter what I or the other fans think- he felt he
> deserved 25% and a "senile and vile" judge agreed with him.

so true
 
Back
Top Bottom