Observer Moz Interview: Full transcript

Bejaysus!

I never heard Moz say "Bejaysus" before! Anyway, very interesting interview. I think Moz is actually getting more honest in his old age. This thing with Joyce is lame. Why can't Moz let it go? It's not like he's being raped. Joyce did a lot of drumming, hard work! So what if he was a slut and a drunk and desperate for money? There's no shame in poverty! Is Morrissey's name on the deed for his mother's and sister's houses? If not, I don't see how Joyce can put a "charge" on them (whatever that means.) Maybe Moz bought them houses, which if so, is very cool! I think the interview explained more about the team that is Moz and his mother. Remember in the Roggin book there was a quote from some schoolmate who saw Moz kiss his mother on the lips when he was like an adolecent or something? Eww! Anyway...
Lack of interest in sex? Contradicts the Roggin book which implies Moz experimented in sex at an early age, plus Moz once referred to sex as "fine cuisine." As for Johnny never sleeping with anybody during the Smiths, is he referring to groupies? 'Cos maybe the reason Johnny didn't sleep with groupies is because he had a steady girlfriend who he married!
Let's see...I'm glad the Bowie speculations have finally been put to rest although a lot of people knew he dropped out of the tour because of a problem with Bowie, not "depression." That hospital thing was an obvious stunt.
Anyway, I used to want to know Morrissey in person, but I'm glad I got over that. He sounds so into himself that he wouldn't care about anyone else's feelings anyway. Selfish, childish, etc.

> Hey guys. Here is the Moz interview in today's Observer magazine, which I
> got off the website. I'm going to buy it later so I'll let you know about
> piccies etc. Enjoy!

> GD

> PS 2 days left!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> Sunday September 15, 2002
> The Observer

> The man with the thorn in his side

> He has been rejected by the music industry, but still sells out the Albert
> Hall and can make Lynn Barber want to kiss his feet. We catch up with
> Morrissey in Colorado to talk about celibacy, feuding and why he doesn't
> do friends.

> The Colorado Music Hall. How glamorous it sounds! How dismal it is! A
> bleak, concrete shed off the highway a few miles out of Colorado Springs,
> it looks as though it might have been built originally as a cattle pen. It
> has a neon sign outside, but the neon doesn't work - I can dimly make out
> MORRISY in straggling letters. In the foyer there is a long bar with
> people fighting for polystyrene beakers of beer; there is a trestle table
> with 'Morrissey Merchandise' which consists of an old poster and a few
> grey T-shirts. No one seems to be buying.
> Backstage, Morrissey's dressing room is hardly more than a lavatory with a
> couple of plastic bags on the floor (there is no table) containing sliced
> bread. In his 80s heyday, with The Smiths, his contract used to stipulate
> that his dressing-room should contain vegetarian food, wine, fruit juice
> and 'flowers to the approximate value of £50 sterling, including gladioli,
> no roses or flowers with thorns' though later he replaced this with the
> demand for 'a live tree with a minimum height of 3ft and a maximum height
> of 5ft'. The tour manager used to carry a saw in his briefcase in case the
> tree provided was too tall. But there is no tree in tonight's
> dressing-room.

> Morrissey's set begins with a recording of John Betjeman reading his poem
> A Child Ill, which might as well be in Urdu for all the impact it makes.
> Morrissey wanders onstage, looking portly in a long, brown cardigan. A few
> fans in the front cheer, but most of the audience are still milling round
> buying beer. Then he sings - and suddenly I see the whole point of
> Morrissey which was a mystery to me before. He is amazing - not just the
> lyrics and the voice, and the weird barks and yelps - but also his strange
> movements, the diva-like caressing of his body, the writhing on the floor,
> the almost Greta Garbo way he arches his neck. It is wildly camp, insanely
> provocative for Hicksville, USA. When he sings his vegetarian anthem,
> 'Meat is Murder', you think all these beef-fed cowboys in the audience
> might rush the stage and kill him. The grandeur, the sheer courage of his
> performance, completely transcends the dinginess of his surroundings. I am
> quite seriously tempted to run onstage and kiss his feet.

> I had been warned that Morrissey could be flakey and difficult. But when
> I'd interviewed him earlier in the day, I found him exceptionally polite,
> friendly and tolerant of my ignorance of pop music. He went to great
> lengths to explain to me why Jarvis Cocker was not a patch on him -
> basically, he said, because he can't sing - while also claiming that he
> never listened to Pulp. He made good jokes, including jokes against
> himself. When I asked why he was so anti drink and drugs, he said, 'It's
> really self control, isn't it? I don't mind getting drunk, but it's not
> something I do very often. I mean - I am quite human. From a distance.'

> He is 43 and looks it - a bit thickening around the middle, a bit greying
> at the temples. He is wearing a denim suit so ludicrously tight and
> pintucked it must be by some famous designer, but otherwise he seems quite
> normal. He has a Manchester accent and a dry Mancunian wit, but he also
> often says 'Bejaysus!' which presumably he gets from his Irish parents. He
> explains that he is in the middle of a three-month tour, going round
> American towns, then to England for two concerts at the Royal Albert Hall,
> and on to Australia and Paris. He likes to tour, he says, because he likes
> singing in front of audiences - simple as that. He admits that Colorado
> Springs is a bit off the beaten track, but 'I think it's a test of one's
> own private strengths that you can go to the more obscure markets.'

> His career is at an odd point. He always tells the British press that he
> is 'big in the States' but actually no one I met in the States had even
> heard of him. On the other hand, his two concerts at the Royal Albert Hall
> next week are fully sold out, which suggests that he still has a good fan
> base in the UK. But are these merely old Smiths fans, still holding the
> torch? He says not - he says he attracts teenagers who were barely born
> when The Smiths were around. But if so, it's a bit of a mystery how he
> gets them because he hasn't had a recording deal since 1996, when Mercury
> signed him for three albums, but dropped him after the first.

> He still goes to see record companies in search of a deal: 'But they all
> ask me how much I'm prepared to compromise, and I say "Nothing."
> One company said, "Yes, we'll sign you, but we'd like you to make an
> album with Radiohead" - which doesn't mean anything to me. And
> several labels have said, "Yes, we'd like to sign you but we don't
> want to sign your musicians." There's always some absurd condition
> which makes absolutely no sense. And all the labels in America have said:
> "Will your music fit in with what is successful in the American
> charts?" To which I reply: "Bejaysus, I hope it doesn't!"
> And then I'm out on the street immediately. If you saw me at those
> meetings, you'd feel really pitifully sorry for me.'

> So no record deal then. Which means no radio play. Which means no new
> fans. Which means that his career - which already looks pretty flakey in
> Colorado Springs - is bound to dwindle. Of course at present, he still
> gets a good income from The Smiths royalties but he admits, 'I don't know
> whether it will keep rolling in - it's not for me to say. I don't really
> try to make anything happen - I don't force anything at all. I don't feel
> that I'm in the midst of a career and I don't feel good grief, I must make
> money - that never occurs to me. Everything evolves quite naturally, as if
> some unseen guiding hand is in the background.'

> Anyway, he can still afford to live very comfortably. He has a house in
> Ireland, but for the past four years he has lived in Los Angeles, off
> Sunset Boulevard, in a house that was built by Clark Gable for Carole
> Lombard. When I ask if he lives next door to Johnny Depp, as the press
> always says, he corrects me, 'No - he lives next door to me.' Los Angeles
> suits him, he says, because 'it's a particularly sexless city. Everybody's
> bodies are so sanitised, so caked in every conceivable exfoliation,
> cologne and mousse, they have no trace of any kind of sexuality, nothing
> real and earthy. So I blend in very well!'

> Nowadays he is a fairly rare visitor to Manchester - he pays flying visits
> to see his mother, sister, and father who all live in the area, but never
> for very long. 'I feel a cavalcade of very strange emotions when I go
> there - a city that turned me away and then accepted me under very
> peculiar circumstances. When I was a teenager it was always very
> difficult. At the age of 12, I would go and see David Bowie and Roxy
> Music, and that's very young to be wandering about Manchester by yourself.
> I saw all the important concerts at the time, but it was a very solitary
> experience, there was no gang, no camaraderie, no union of any kind.
> Nobody really understood the music that I liked. People forget how austere
> the early 70s were. There weren't that many people who would confess to
> liking David Bowie, let alone the New York Dolls, certainly not among the
> hard cases of Manchester.'

> He was a classic bedroom pop obsessive, but of course even more obsessive
> than most. From the age of 10 he bought all the music papers and would be
> 'inconsolable' if one of them was missing. He also wrote endless
> nitpicking letters - sometimes 30 a day - to the NME and other music
> papers, correcting their mistakes and lambasting their opinions. Before he
> was even a teenager, he was a walking expert on pop music. 'I never fell
> in love with people or places: I always fell in love with 7in singles. I
> took pop music very seriously. I thought it was the heart of everything, I
> thought it affected everybody and moved everybody. It started me as a
> person. As a child I would sing every single night - and the neighbours
> would complain - because I had this insane desire to sing. I was obsessed
> with vocal melody - and remain so. So it's been a lifetime's preoccupation
> really. And at the expense of everything else you could possibly name.'

> But despite a brief involvement with a group called The Nosebleeds, it
> seemed he might be singing to his bedroom wall for ever. Until, in 1982,
> Johnny Marr walked into his life. Marr was four years younger than
> Morrissey, but already had good contacts in the Manchester music scene.
> Morrissey showed him the lyrics he had written; Marr set them to music;
> they went out and hired two other musicians, called themselves The Smiths
> (an odd choice of name, given that most of them had Irish parents) and
> within a year they were famous. 'It was a very overnight success,'
> Morrissey agrees. 'And to step from the huddled shyness of my life - I had
> never had a life, I had never had a bank account, or a car - and to be the
> one stepping forward, explaining this magnificent game plan, which only
> ever existed in my head, was a fantastic learning process.'

> In their five-year reign, The Smiths produced five bestselling albums and
> 14 hit singles. It was, as Morrissey says, 'a very, very pure success
> story'. But in 1987, Johnny Marr announced that he was leaving and that
> was the end of The Smiths. Morrissey was devastated - it came out of the
> blue as far as he was concerned. He has not seen Marr since, except in
> court, and claims he has no desire to see him. 'Why would you want to see
> someone who'd said bad things about you? It doesn't occur to me. He's
> never said anything nice about the solo music I've made. And he knows that
> at the end of The Smiths I was in a very depressed state - and that
> possibly the fact that he broke The Smiths up could have killed me. But,
> instead, I triumphed somewhat - and he's never said well done.'

> Morrissey claims 'nobody was more surprised than I was' when he
> successfully started a solo career. His first album, Viva Hate, was a hit.
> But then successive albums did less well, and his last one, Maladjusted,
> hardly sold at all. It didn't help that he kept switching managers, and
> walked out of a tour with David Bowie in 1995. His then assistant Jo Slee
> said it was because 'he was very ill with depression. He was coming apart
> at the seams.' But Morrissey says it was because Bowie kept badgering him
> to sing one of his songs.

> And then there was the court case. I made the mistake of raising the
> subject by asking - in passing, I thought - whether he'd now settled his
> long-running lawsuit with Mike Joyce, the former Smiths bass player.
> Suddenly Morrissey was off, galloping into a monologue which became
> increasingly weird as it went on. He said he'd 'never come face to face
> with human evil' until he encountered the judge, John Weeks. He uses the
> name John Weeks like an incantation or a curse.

> The court case arose because, after The Smiths ended in 1987 and Morrissey
> and Marr went their separate ways, the two other Smiths, Andy Rourke and
> Mike Joyce, began thinking they'd been underpaid, in that they only got 10
> per cent of The Smiths earnings, instead of 25 per cent. (This is
> performing royalties, not composing royalties, to which obviously only
> Morrissey and Marr were entitled.) The situation was complicated because
> Joyce and Rourke had never had a contract - in fact, legally, they didn't
> exist. Anyway, Rourke and Joyce sued Morrissey and Marr for back earnings.
> Rourke soon dropped out, but Joyce persisted and the case came to the high
> court in 1996. Summing up in favour of Joyce, the judge pronounced
> Morrissey 'devious, truculent, and unreliable' and ordered him and Marr to
> pay Joyce £1.25m in back earnings. Marr paid up, but Morrissey pursued the
> case to appeal - where it was dismissed.

> Obviously it must have been a blow - but it was six years ago, you'd think
> Morrissey would have got over it by now. Ha! 'It was an extraordinary
> miscarriage of justice,' he rants. 'The whole point of this court case was
> to say Mr Joyce is a poor shambolic character in desperate need of money
> who has been treated abysmally by Morrissey and Marr - when the fact was
> he had been treated with absolute generosity, considering the minor role
> that he played. He played his instrument and went home. He was always in
> search of more shags. Now Johnny Marr and myself, throughout the history
> of The Smiths, never slept with anybody, and took The Smiths very
> seriously. We stayed up till the small hours perfecting and shaping
> everything. Joyce was the exact opposite - he had no sense of duty. So
> when this person therefore, 10 years after the group has ended, starts
> demanding £1m...'

> Marr and Morrissey were in court together, but didn't speak except through
> their lawyers. At the end, Marr accepted the judgement ,but Morrissey took
> the case to appeal where he fared no better. 'You go to the appeal court
> and you come across three judges who are the same age, colour, background,
> demeanour, as the judge about whom you are complaining. And their attitude
> is, "How dare you disagree with one of our friends?"' So
> Morrissey complained to the Prime Minister, the Queen ('Tony Blair was not
> at all interested; the Queen was very nice'), the Lord Chancellor, the
> ombudsman, the Law Society, the Bar Council - 'But they just collect
> complaints in order to protect the judges.' Joyce meanwhile put a charge
> on Morrissey's mother's house and his sister's house, (presumably because
> Morrissey has no property in the UK) which makes them unsellable until the
> claim is settled.

> Morrissey is now taking the case to the European Court of Human Rights,
> though he admits it is costing him a fortune - 'because with each new
> solicitor that I get to defend me, they view the overall situation and
> find it so extraordinary that they immediately place a bill before me for
> 100 grand before they do anything'. Wouldn't it be healthier, saner and
> cheaper just to cut his losses? 'No. I will never give up. I will fight
> till the last fibre of my body is spilled. I will go down with the ship.
> And my mother as well. We will never be beaten, not at all, because we
> have right on our side.' But meanwhile, the case seems to be blighting his
> life. 'No. it has strengthened my resolve. I'm not shrivelled up in a box
> in Manchester surrounded by empty beer bottles. They're going to have to
> fight long and hard to bring me down.'

> Phew. I'm sorry I ever raised that subject because it was half an hour of
> almost undiluted venom. And I noticed later, when Morrissey's assistant
> Blossom asked what we talked about and I told her, 'The court case quite a
> lot', her face fell. I bet all his friends - not that he has any friends
> according to him - know not to press that button. Anyway, I was glad to
> change the subject and ask about his nonexistent love life, which he
> always seems happy to discuss.

> Does he have relationships ever? 'Not physical relationships, no. I mean
> there are some people on this planet who aren't obsessed with sex, and I'm
> one of them. I'm not interested. And I'm not cloaking something, I'm not
> going somewhere under cover of night and existing in some wild secretive
> way. I wasn't interested when I was 17, I wasn't interested when I was 27,
> I was less interested when I was 37 and I'm even less interested now. I
> really enjoy my own company enormously, so I don't feel a great gaping
> hole. I sit at home at night and I feel absolutely honoured not having to
> cater for anybody, or listen, or put up with anybody. I feel it's a great
> privilege to live alone.'

> Who is his best friend? He laughs derisively, 'My best friend? At the age
> of 43? My credit card!' Not even a cat? 'No. My best friend is myself. I
> look after myself very, very well. I can rely on myself never to let
> myself down. I'm the last person I want to see at night and the first in
> the morning. I am endlessly fascinating - at eight o clock at night, at
> midnight, I'm fascinated. It's a lifelong relationship and divorce will
> never come into it. That's why, as I say, I feel privileged. And that is
> an honest reply.'

> I believe him. But given his admitted self-obsession, it seems
> extraordinary that he is in an industry like pop music, which by
> definition entails being popular and communicating with other people.
> 'Yes,' he agrees. 'It's an enormous contradiction really. But the fluffy
> elements of pop stardom, if you like, are not why I'm here. I'm generally
> very interested in the written word and changing the poetic landscape of
> pop music, and I think I've achieved that. I think, with The Smiths, I
> introduced a harsh romanticism which has been picked up by many people and
> which didn't exist previously. And it's nice to be a curious footnote to
> the whole story of British popular music. And not to be compliant,
> smiling, bland.' And with that, he goes off, smiling, to his concert at
> the Colorado Music Hall, where I suddenly - too late - discover the point
> of Morrissey.

> · Morrissey is at the Royal Albert Hall on 17 and 18 September.
 
lawyers are sharks!

whatever happened to "lawyer, liar!"? I know a better way for Moz to get rid of his money. I know Moz hates charities, but I want to start a really good one. it's called "Fund for Poor College Graduates." Why is it that uneducated, ignorant, drug addicts get all the welfare? If Moz wants to donate to my charity tell him to contact me and that I will be the first one to receive some money.

> doesn't morrissey also consider the fact that these lawyers that he's
> going to are probably thinking "hell, this case doesn't stand a
> snowball's chance in hell, but the money sure is good"? why go broke
> feeding the mouths of leaches?

> they aren't going to be honest with him. its the sad truth. they'll take
> his money AND leave with no change in judgment. and they already know
> he'll be paying Mike and that's why they're asking for money up front.
> that whole line over "this is extroardinary and we need cash" is
> complete bullshit. most lawyers don't get paid unless judgment is in their
> favor and they can already smell it a mile away that it won't win.

> they are all going out and having a drink in celebration that they are
> representing a big name with a large checkbook and they can use this as
> leverage to get more money out of their other clients since they've now
> hit "the big time"

> and it has nothing to do with who is right and wrong at this point.
 
oh yeah, that was odd! and one more odd thing I noticed, he wrote 30 letters a day to the NME? we all know Moz is obsessive, but that's beyond obsession!

> Totally agree about Morrissey's apparent bitterness although Lynn Barber
> could be exaggerating. I think he should move on because legal stuff is so
> stressful. I can't imagine how it must feel living with it hanging over
> you for years. However, if he wants to appeal, good luck. I hope it all
> gets sorted out and he can get on with what he does best - making great
> pop records.

> The oddest thing about the interview was the stuff about him writing to
> Tony Blair, the Queen, the Lord Chancellor etc about the case and him
> saying "The Queen was very nice about it." Did anyone else
> notice that??




t.racer
 
> but the thing is, it seems these days that morrissey is getting
> fulfillment beating himself over the head over lost causes.

> he is offended that the large record labels ask him to change musicians or
> do whatever it is they want him to do, yet, like a masochist, he keeps
> chasing after them instead of taking a smaller label who would support his
> decision and give the middle finger to the others. after 5 years of
> talking to them all, he presses on and its like getting blood out of a
> turnip.

oh yeah, and I want to know which label said Moz would have to do a record with Radiohead. HAHAHA. that was soooo hilarious! Moz could go with a smaller label or release an album on his own. he *has* options unlike some people in the world!
 
Re: To The Bitter End

i find the situation both hilarious and sad. morrissey is such a character and i think it's cool that he sticks to his principles, despite the fact that it makes him appear greedy to the cynics out there.
 
he hasn't changed much then, has he?

having been on a long sabbatical from the World of Morrissey and seeing this interview as well as his appearances, it really appears that he's still the same frustrating person he was a few years back, taking his artistry and applying it to life's monstrous quarrels. he says he's quite happy during the Kilborn affair, but has he improved the way he manages anything?

in a way it's kind of admirable, but after awhile it's like a case for the insanity defense...i for one would have felt awful if i had actually seen him go on that tandem about the court case, i feel a little sad just reading about it. i mean really, why not just write that aging lout a check, say something very unpleasant while you're at it and leave it at that? i'd hate to see Moz end up like this one guy i read about, who spent a long time planning to break out of prison, and when he does he is captured eventually; while in, he only had a few months left in his original sentence and ended up with 15 years added for the breakout.
 
Re: To The Bitter End

> i find the situation both hilarious and sad. morrissey is such a character
> and i think it's cool that he sticks to his principles, despite the fact
> that it makes him appear greedy to the cynics out there.

i don't think he acts out of greed. I think that if you ask him, he probably carries on with this Mike Joyce case not necessarily to hold on to his money, but more of an act of punishing Mike. Morrissey probably believes that there could have been a good chance that at some point a smiths reunion could have happened had not Mike and Andy decided to sue. He probably forgives Andy more because he finally backed down, but i remember that in some interview, he accused Mike of putting the nail in the coffin.

And lets not already forget the amount of anger and rejection he was carrying around with him when Johnny left. its like when someone finds out that their mate is cheating on them. do they get angry at their mate? no. they hunt down the person who interfered.
 
Re: To The Bitter End

i agree. i dont think morrissey is greedy. money is not his motivation. i just think that he appears greedy to people who dont know the whole story.

does anyone know whether morrissey sold the rights to the songs yet? i remember reading (probably here) that he made or stood to make upwards of 20 mil on the deal. it doesnt sound like something he would do though, and it seems to me that if he did, we'd be hearing smiths songs everywhere!
 
Re: To The Bitter End

> i agree. i dont think morrissey is greedy. money is not his motivation. i
> just think that he appears greedy to people who dont know the whole story.

> does anyone know whether morrissey sold the rights to the songs yet? i
> remember reading (probably here) that he made or stood to make upwards of
> 20 mil on the deal. it doesnt sound like something he would do though, and
> it seems to me that if he did, we'd be hearing smiths songs everywhere!

he just said on Kilborn that he's not a sell out. but who knows? he says his best friend's his credit card.
 
He's Lost HIS Appeal. Sad but true

> f*** that punk

I find that if you want to sound sensible when taking issue with someone's comments, it's best not to start off with 'f*** that punk'.

> wasn't it said by morrissey that he and marr always considered the other
> two as "readily replacable as lawnmower parts"

No, you are incorrect. Johnny never said any such thing. Morrissey, and Morrissey alone, said it. He never said that he 'always' considered them as such. He only started insulting them once the legal action was underway. Morrissey is down on record as saying that Andy & Mike are two of the most capable musicians around.

> he's a piece of shit to put that lien on his mum and sisters homes
> f***ing bastard - he's just riding on morrissey's name.

Morrissey owns both homes. His mother lives in Morrisseys old house in Cheshire, and, I believe, he bought his sister Jackie, her house too. If Morrissey had not put his own name on the deeds, this situation would never have arisen.

> think about it. if you slaved over the lyrics as moz did
> would you really think, "mmm ya, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4"

You don't understand the whole court case, do you? Morrissey & Marr split the publishing deal 50/50, and the writers royalties. The only royalties due to Mike & Andy, were the performance royalties, which really should have been split 4 ways. How can you say that Mike & Andy didn't perform as much as Morrissey & Marr? Actually, Mike & Andy played more than Morrissey sang! Intros, outros, instrumentals, etc.. There was still drums & bass while Morrissey wasn't singing, so maybe they should have received a greater percentage of performance royalties, than Morrissey did?

> have you ever read any of the Joyce or Rourke comments/quotes?

Yes.

> they are about as intelligent as my pinky finger

Should only vastly intelligent people get paid for their work? If so, there would be millions & millions of people worldwide, who are working hard, yet starving though lack of payment. I suspect that you would be one of them.

> he's out for himself and he expected morrissey to buy into it.

He played with the Smiths for 6 years. He didn't do a 'Craig Gannon'. Weird that Craig didn't get this much grief about taking Morrissey to court, isn't it? Maybe it's because Morrissey wasn't as 'vocal' in his condemnation of Craig, as he has been, and is still is, with Mike. Morrissey has a lot of influence with people, he's very manipulative. If this situation arose in any other situation, the same people who are lambasting Mike & Andy, would be defending the poor downtrodden individual who was being ripped off. Morrissey is clever, and he knows the power he wields.

> Marr just paid to shut the f***er up -

Marr paid because the British legal system told him to pay, based on the evidence. Morrissey didn't help himself during the case though. He was very evasive, and didn't fully answer questions which were put to him. Judges tend not to like that. Maybe if Morrissey had been more open in court, the situation could have been different. We'll never know.

> morrissey's not that easy to pull the wool over.

Morrissey is extremely egotistical, and he doesn't like to lose at anything. He is a very vindictive character, and not a nice person. He is a liar, and this has been proven on many occasions, not least in the brand new Observer interview. I honestly believe that Morrissey has a little book, full of the names of people who have sleighted him over the years, and cannot wait for the day when he can tick off those names when he gets his revenge.

>he knows who did what

And so do we, it's a matter of public record. Unfortunately Morrissey continually tries to change history.

> YOU CAN'T BULLSHIT A BULLSHITTER!

Well what Can I say to that?
 
Re: To The Bitter End

> Morrissey probably
> believes that there could have been a good chance that at some point a
> smiths reunion could have happened had not Mike and Andy decided to sue.

The problem with a reunion has nothing to do with Mike & Andy. The stumbling block is, and has always been, Johnny. Most Smiths fans wouldn't care who was playing drums & bass. The main draw would be Morrissey & Marr.

> He probably forgives Andy more because he finally backed down,

Andy isn't forgiven, but the main 'criminal' in Morrissey's mind is Mike. There are personal reasons as well as financial, but I shall say nothing more about that. Morrissey never believes that he is wrong. He never apologises for anything.

> but i remember that in some interview, he accused Mike of putting the nail in
> the coffin.

Morrissey would accuse Mike of causing the downfall of the Holy Roman Empire, if he thought anyone would believe him. The court case is no concern of anyone other than those who were members on the Smiths. Morrissey was the one who chose to write songs about it, and drag it into every interview he has done for the last 5 years. It makes him look so childish. Does he not realise that people are laughing at him? You can almost imagine him stamping his feet & crying with frustration, just like a small child who cannot get it's own way. Truly pathetic. It's all his mothers fault, you know.

> And lets not already forget the amount of anger and rejection he was
> carrying around with him when Johnny left.

Which was entirely of Morrisseys own doing. Morrissey made the situation impossible for Johnny to stay. Johnny didn't want to leave the Smiths. He was forced out by Morrisseys posessiveness.

> its like when someone finds out that their mate is cheating on them.
> do they get angry at their mate? no.

Yes, actually. Well, I certainly would.

> they hunt down the person who interfered.

Maybe in your neck of the woods. Certainly not in my world. If someone betrays you, you have nothing more to do with that person. Spending time on vendettas is merely a waste of time & energy. And money, in this case.
 
> Morrissey just needs a sounding board for his intellctual prowess, and
> rhetoric (we're all he has)

You're falling for what he wants you to believe! You probably still believe that Morrissey was a celibate, friendless failed librarian, during the Smiths days too! Morrissey has many friends! Why do you refuse to see that? He plays the role of someone who no-one understands, and who is locked into his bedroom unless performing. Sad thing is, people like you believe it! It's total rubbish!

> he tries to hang on as life pulls him along (albeit unwillingly)

Oh my good God!! Again, total rubbish!

> i think what Moz wants more than anything is EMPATHY
> and unfortunately, he'll never get that from the Music Industry
> Mainstream America rarely understands anything other than mediocrity
> and the music industry only see Vacous, Insincere, Ineluctable, mind
> numbing, subordinate, Provincial, Pimps (who by the way have the rhythming
> ablitities of that of my 6 year old nephew) with $$$$$$$ in their eyes.

And why has Morrissey not signed a deal yet? Listen to him, and it's beacause he can't have total control. The real reason is $$$$$$$$, and not enough of it.
 
> oh yeah, and I want to know which label said Moz would have to do a record
> with Radiohead.

Chances are that it is 'Radiohead's' record label. IF such a suggestion was ever made.

> Moz could go with a
> smaller label or release an album on his own.

Maybe the cash he is wasting on his 'dead horse' of an appeal against Mike's judgement, would be better spent on getting his music 'out there', to the fans who he 'loves' so much.
 
Hi I'm Lionel Hutz and I'm representing Morrissey

>most lawyers don't get paid unless judgment is in their favor

Um, yeah, if you get one of those ambulance chasers who advertise on TV. I know Morrissey watches a lot of TV, but I really don't think that's the kind of lawyers he's using.
 
Hi I'm Pizza Hutz and I'm representing Mozarella
 
He's not doing it just to punish Mike, or because he's greedy

It's the principle, he feels he's been horribly wronged and he's fighting for justice. Can you even imagine if someone sued you on grounds that you thought were totally ridiculous, unfair, and unjust and that person won and you were told you had to pay them a million dollars?? Do you have any idea how hard that would be to swallow?
 
Re: He's not doing it just to punish Mike, or because he's greedy

> It's the principle, he feels he's been horribly wronged and he's fighting
> for justice. Can you even imagine if someone sued you on grounds that you
> thought were totally ridiculous, unfair, and unjust and that person won
> and you were told you had to pay them a million dollars??

But we all know that Mike's grounds for the lawsuit weren't 'totally ridiculous, unfair, and unjust'. He fought the case and won. This wasn't simply a disagreement between two people. It was a case presented before lawyers, who had all of the relevant paperwork, witnesses, etc, and a decision reached by a panel of judges, both during the trial and in subsequent appeals.

Don't believe that the Judges found against Morrissey just because they 'didn't like him'. That's a ludicrous suggestion, and if that was the case, then the appeal would certainly not have been dismissed at subsequent hearings.

Morrissey is using the media to get his fans believing that he was in the right, and that Mike was unjust in his legal action. Morrisseys actions are doing exactly what he intended them to. Just look at this board. You're all believing him.

Can you believe that Morrissey wrote to Tony Blair, and the QUEEN?? THE QUEEN!! She should have written back saying 'THE APPEAL IS DEAD'. Heavens! I'm not surprised that they weren't interested!

>Do you have any idea how hard that would be to swallow?

I'm sure that Morrissey has had to swallow harder things than that in his time. And I think we all know what I'm talking about.
 
Re: He's not doing it just to punish Mike, or because he's greedy

> It's the principle, he feels he's been horribly wronged and he's fighting
> for justice. Can you even imagine if someone sued you on grounds that you
> thought were totally ridiculous, unfair, and unjust and that person won
> and you were told you had to pay them a million dollars?? Do you have any
> idea how hard that would be to swallow?

you know, i swallow things all the freaking time despite the principle of the matter. but i'm usually the first person to bail, so i can't really identify with this.

but let's look at it. this thing has gone on for well over 10 years. its now costing more in legal costs than it is for him to move on. The money he's worked for and earned is being sucked off by lawyers who see deep pockets, a person who wants to press on ahead like Captain Ahab, and a chance to play big shot at the european courts. They're in heaven at this point.

They don't have morrissey's interests at stake, so you know they aren't going to try and bust their asses anyhow to do the right thing, and you know that if he came to them and said "i don't have the money, but i believe i was wronged" they would have checked to see how the other court battles and appeals went, analyzed the likelihood of it being reversed which is tied into the likelihood of being paid for their services, and advised him right off the bat to just go ahead and settle and kicked him out the door.

Humans don't live to be 300 years old. He's given roughly 1/8 of his life to stewing over it, drawing it out, appealing it. And the thing about money is that once you die, you can't take it with you anyhow.

Its no longer about losing money. Its about losing the prime of your life.

But as i said, I think its not just about money. I think he looks at all the bad feelings and mud slinging that popped up over the original trial and that little glimmer of hope that he and johnny could reconcile got completely squashed.
 
> they aren't going to be honest with him. its the sad truth. they'll take
> his money AND leave with no change in judgment. and they already know
> he'll be paying Mike and that's why they're asking for money up front.
> that whole line over "this is extroardinary and we need cash" is
> complete bullshit. most lawyers don't get paid unless judgment is in their
> favor and they can already smell it a mile away that it won't win.

What you're talking about are contingent fees, and those are normally used by *plaintiffs'* lawyers in personal injury matters. The main purpose is to allow people who can't afford an attorney to have access to the legal system to vindicate their rights. But anyway, my understanding is that contingency fees are prohibited in England, as that country is more anti-litigation than America. So yeah, talking out of your ass as usual.

I don't know what agreement Morrissey made with his lawyer, but he willingly agreed to it. If the lawyer doesn't change the judgment, that doesn't mean he/she didn't do a good job. I don't know why you'd think lawyers exist to give free services to rich rock stars you admire. Anyway, none of this would've gone to court had The Smiths consulted a decent lawyer to begin with, back in the day. then they'd have had a clear agreement any court could understand.
 
> What you're talking about are contingent fees, and those are normally used
> by *plaintiffs'* lawyers in personal injury matters. The main purpose is
> to allow people who can't afford an attorney to have access to the legal
> system to vindicate their rights. But anyway, my understanding is that
> contingency fees are prohibited in England, as that country is more
> anti-litigation than America. So yeah, talking out of your ass as usual.

OK, so what on earth was that back in '96 when the judge ruled that they also had to pay court costs? and from the article in how he was saying how they were demanding that sort of money up front, i was led to assume that they usually don't ask for that sort of thing. I'm not a lawyer. i simply deduce from what i read.

And i'm sorry you have to be a freaking 2 year old about everything because you and whiney George sit around and suck your thumbs about Iraq all day. ooh let me bow before your big brain loafing oaf. I hope they preserve your brain in a museum next to Einstein's, but you know that archaeologists are funny and they might dig you up in a few thousand years time and mistake you for a mutant man with an Orangutan's brain.

> I don't know what agreement Morrissey made with his lawyer, but he
> willingly agreed to it. If the lawyer doesn't change the judgment, that
> doesn't mean he/she didn't do a good job. I don't know why you'd think
> lawyers exist to give free services to rich rock stars you admire. Anyway,
> none of this would've gone to court had The Smiths consulted a decent
> lawyer to begin with, back in the day. then they'd have had a clear
> agreement any court could understand.
 
Back
Top Bottom