It's already happened. "They" have interviewed us. Several times. And we'll tell you what we told them before we showed them the door with a friendly "f*** off": You need to actually read what we write, not inteject your own fantasy version. Warning the world of #AnimalAlQaeda type scenarios is not endorsing or encouraging them, but the foolish and frightened will take that explanatory framework from the Murdoch & Koch press if/when such an event occurs. #VegAnarchyInTheUK is a song of peace in a world riven by war. There is no homophobia whatsoever, we're Queer and we're here, deal with it. Like black rappers can appropriate the language of the Oppressor, so can we, any way we like, so long as there is sufficient Irony in the gas-tank. Nice try, but utterly lame FAIL! attempt at censorship and mischief-making Chinese whispers about our stated position.
Yes, this isn't the original "BrummieBoy" as that Autofiction has been retired to the grave. It's only purpose was to warn Morrissey to recant and repent his #CrimesAgainstCows through his corpse-munching Cheesetarian "Vegetarian" nonsense. If you still fail to understand the urgency of BB's attempt to save Morrissey's soul and legacy, read it from another source. Vegetarians are, by and large, useful idiots, puppets controlled by Carnism and Speciesism, that's why Morrissey acheived a certain level of B list fame in the music industry, because he was all bluster and his words/music threatened nobody within the BBC Countryfile vile Agri-Fascist matrix. Gary Francione is right in this quote except for the last line, insofar as it relates to Morrissey:
The Paradigm Shift Requires Clarity About the Moral Baseline: Veganism
"There are some animal advocates who say that to maintain that veganism is the moral baseline is objectionable because it is “judgmental,” or constitutes a judgment that veganism is morally preferable to vegetarianism and a condemnation that vegetarians (or other consumers of animal products) are “bad” people. Yes to the first part; no to the second. There is no coherent distinction between flesh and other animal products. They are all the same and we cannot justify consuming any of them. To say that you do not eat flesh but that you eat dairy or eggs or whatever, or that you don’t wear fur but you wear leather or wool, is like saying that you eat the meat from spotted cows but not from brown cows; it makes no sense whatsoever. The supposed “line” between meat and everything else is just a fantasy–an arbitrary distinction that is made to enable some exploitation to be segmented off and regarded as “better” or as morally acceptable. This is not a condemnation of vegetarians who are not vegans; it is, however, a plea to those people to recognize their actions do not conform with a moral principle that they claim to accept and that all animal products are the result of imposing suffering and death on sentient beings. It is not a matter of judging individuals; it is, however, a matter of judging practices and institutions. And that is a necessary component of ethical living.
If we take the position that an assessment that veganism is morally preferable to vegetarianism is not possible because we are all “on our own journey,” then moral assessment becomes completely impossible or is speciesist. It is impossible because if we are all “on our own journey,” then there is nothing to say to the racist, sexist, anti-semite, homophobe, etc. If we say that those forms of discrimination are morally bad, but, with respect to animals, we are all “on our own journey” and we cannot make moral assessments about, for instance, dairy consumption, then we are simply being speciesist and not applying the same moral analysis to nonhumans that we apply to the human context.
When we discuss veganism with vegetarians or other consumers of animal products, we should never convey the message that we think that they are “bad” people. "
http://www.abolitionistapproach.com...out-the-moral-baseline-veganism/#.VaLdmvl8sba
We can make an exception with Morrissey, he is indeed a 'bad' person and a morally blind hypocrite. His 33 years of berating others for eating meat whilst he stuffed his gut with cheese is his legacy of patronising arrogance disguising moral turpitude. He has aligned his life with the death camp regimes and has yet to publicly confirm he has recanted, repented and adopted a Vegan lifestyle. Thus he becomes the subject of the 3rd verse of #VegAnarchyInTheUK which is a tragedy but he was warned of this fate many, many times. Stupidly he imagined/imagines his bubble of wealth and fame will protect his Legacy. It won't. His legacy is trashed, by his own hand, by nobody else. To confirm and clarify, we are entirely pacifist and we seek to prevent any escalation of conflict between humans. That's why the UK vote on Fox-Murder 'sports' is so important, as there are seriously psychotic people out there who may be tripped into acts of random terror if the current edgy consensus is capriciously disrupted due to David Cameron's vanity projects. We trust this clarifies the issue for you, but you appear to be intent on imposing your own narrative. Good luck with that one! MI5/6 tried and failed, they have nothing on us, or nothing that's legal and/or evidence based. We know exactly what we are doing and it isn't glorifying acts of terror.
best wishes
The Ghost of BrummieBoy
