The thing is, she makes a positive contribution to this site: she does stuff.
Nobody’s perfect.
It’s ‘dying’ Nerak. And whilst I respect your generosity the person you’re engaging with is simply (if you’ll forgive my language) ‘coming the c***’. Start seeing the worst in people, if it’s how they want to present themselves here.
Great, with that weight off your chest your next post might be worthwhile.You're another person who believes himself to be smarter than he actually is. That's the second time you've butted in and said something when I haven't mentioned you once. Your whole comment builds to calling me a 'wanker', which apparently is supposed to be a devastating indictment of my character, but it's just another vague insult the likes of which people hurl at each other every day on here and as such has ceased to mean anything. I'm not even the 'Melvis' person that you think you're talking to; doesn't Melvis usually post under the name 'Melvis' anyway? I'm 'Anonymous'. I've only seen Melvis's posts a few times so I don't know what he has said or done to get you so hung up on him but I hope you're able to get past it. So your whole post built to calling someone a 'wanker' and it wasn't even the person you thought it was. Get some fresh air.
And no: Nerak makes this website worse; her posts are low-effort rapid-fire spam. "Doing stuff" isn't inherently positive, and that's a very low bar to set. 'Positive' contributors to this website on Morrissey related topics have included ('positive' meaning they wrote sensible posts which were worth reading): BrummieBoy, Amy, Jamie, Detritus, Joe Frady, and the person with the Oscar Wilde display picture whose name escapes me at the moment (possibly 'Irregular Regular', I'm not sure). Whenever I see a post from any of those people I tend to take the time to stop and read it and I know I'll be no worse off for doing so. When I see a Nerak post I know it's time to #scroll -- and has as much to do with the frequency with which she posts as it does with anything else. This website didn't need 7500 Nerak posts in one year, especially since a high percentage of those posts aren't of a particularly great quality, and if we didn't have those 7500 posts we wouldn't have lost very much, if anything. If she had posted 500 times instead of 7500 she could have made the same points and it would have been in less of a buzzard fashion and therefore more people would probably have a better opinion of her contributions (because four or five of the posts on every page on every thread wouldn't have come from her).
The fact that you think they're positive contributions just because it's "doing stuff" tells me a lot about your standards. If UncleSkinny had a "doing stuff" anti-Morrissey thread where he pointed out Morrissey's hypocritical positions or mean-spirited behaviour over the years you wouldn't be so charitable towards his contributions even though that would be "doing stuff" which is supposedly positive. As I'm writing this a new post has appeared from you and it seems you're still on the same foul-mouthed tirade against someone who isn't even who you think they are, so I'm going to sign off here and let you get that fresh air that you obviously desperately need
That is the eternal mystery. The bitterest on here probably began by making a fatal existential error— by thinking Morrissey was something other than a pop star. He’s a great one, but a he’s ‘just’ a pop star nevertheless. He’d probably be the first to admit (and I think he did in the early nineties) that he doesn’t actually exist.
I did choke on my coffee, when I read that.
Yes, my life would have been so less complicated and frustrating if it had been stamped on his forehead, "Nothing but a pop star".
You're another person who believes himself to be smarter than he actually is. That's the second time you've butted in and said something when I haven't mentioned you once. Your whole comment builds to calling me a 'wanker', which apparently is supposed to be a devastating indictment of my character, but it's just another vague insult the likes of which people hurl at each other every day on here and as such has ceased to mean anything. I'm not even the 'Melvis' person that you think you're talking to; doesn't Melvis usually post under the name 'Melvis' anyway? I'm 'Anonymous'. I've only seen Melvis's posts a few times so I don't know what he has said or done to get you so hung up on him but I hope you're able to get past it. So your whole post built to calling someone a 'wanker' and it wasn't even the person you thought it was. Get some fresh air.
And no: Nerak makes this website worse; her posts are low-effort rapid-fire spam. "Doing stuff" isn't inherently positive, and that's a very low bar to set. 'Positive' contributors to this website on Morrissey related topics have included ('positive' meaning they wrote sensible posts which were worth reading): BrummieBoy, Amy, Jamie, Detritus, Joe Frady, and the person with the Oscar Wilde display picture whose name escapes me at the moment (possibly 'Irregular Regular', I'm not sure). Whenever I see a post from any of those people I tend to take the time to stop and read it and I know I'll be no worse off for doing so. When I see a Nerak post I know it's time to #scroll -- and has as much to do with the frequency with which she posts as it does with anything else. This website didn't need 7500 Nerak posts in one year, especially since a high percentage of those posts aren't of a particularly great quality, and if we didn't have those 7500 posts we wouldn't have lost very much, if anything. If she had posted 500 times instead of 7500 she could have made the same points and it would have been in less of a buzzard fashion and therefore more people would probably have a better opinion of her contributions (because four or five of the posts on every page on every thread wouldn't have come from her).
The fact that you think they're positive contributions just because it's "doing stuff" tells me a lot about your standards. If UncleSkinny had a "doing stuff" anti-Morrissey thread where he pointed out Morrissey's hypocritical positions or mean-spirited behaviour over the years you wouldn't be so charitable towards his contributions even though that would be "doing stuff" which is supposedly positive. As I'm writing this a new post has appeared from you and it seems you're still on the same foul-mouthed tirade against someone who isn't even who you think they are, so I'm going to sign off here and let you get that fresh air that you obviously desperately need
So sad that you don't have a proper library in your area anymore. I love local libraries they can be nice quiet places to read or do work or write letters. Also good for children. I noticed computers and WiFi have started coming into libraries making them more like Internet cafes.
Poor twisted Verso, so fugly, so fugly
Poor twisted Verso, oh hug me, just hug me
Morrissey-solo spawned a yawn inducer when they let this crank sign up
And he later jibed:
"You're a moron, you're an idiot, I'm writing a thesis;
You're a retard, I'm 35 and destined for greatness"
An insight into why all self-respecting persons must pause and draw the line
Anyway, did you like the Herman’s Hermit’s version?
